Colston Loveland
vs Rome Odunze
2026 · Week 5 · Half-PPR
The crowd’s lean
Week 5No weekly comparisons recorded for this pair.
This week
WEEK 5Loveland
at GB
Oct 11 · 1:00 PM ET
Odunze
at GB
Oct 11 · 1:00 PM ET
8.5
Projected
8.0
Projected
Half-PPR
projection
2026 season, per game
2025 season, per game
Full game log & past seasons +
| WK | OPP | FPTS | RANK | TGT | REC | YD | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | — | 0.0 | TE77 | 2 | — | — | — |
2 | — | 0.8 | TE56 | 3 | 1 | 3 | — |
3 | — | 5.1 | TE29 | 4 | 4 | 31 | — |
4 | — | 8.7 | TE18 | 9 | 6 | 57 | — |
Earlier seasons (2025)
| WK | OPP | FPTS | RANK | TGT | REC | YD | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | MIN | 2.2 | TE40 | 2 | 2 | 12 | — |
2 | DET | 0.0 | TE64 | 1 | — | — | — |
3 | DAL | 3.6 | TE32 | 3 | 1 | 31 | — |
4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
6 | WAS | 2.1 | TE42 | 3 | 2 | 11 | — |
7 | NO | 3.9 | TE28 | 4 | 3 | 24 | — |
8 | BAL | 5.3 | TE20 | 5 | 3 | 38 | — |
9 | CIN | 26.8 | TE2 | 7 | 6 | 118 | 2 |
10 | NYG | 7.5 | TE15 | 4 | 4 | 55 | — |
11 | MIN | 5.5 | TE17 | 4 | 3 | 40 | — |
12 | PIT | 12.9 | TE2 | 5 | 4 | 49 | 1 |
13 | PHI | 4.3 | TE28 | 6 | 3 | 28 | — |
14 | GB | 10.9 | TE9 | 5 | 4 | 29 | 1 |
15 | CLE | 8.1 | TE16 | 5 | 4 | 63 | — |
16 | GB | 4.5 | TE23 | 5 | 3 | 30 | — |
17 | SF | 18.4 | TE2 | 10 | 6 | 94 | 1 |
18 | DET | 20.1 | TE1 | 13 | 10 | 91 | 1 |
| WK | OPP | FPTS | RANK | TGT | REC | YD | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | — | 6.2 | WR50 | 3 | 2 | 52 | — |
2 | — | 5.8 | WR47 | 4 | 3 | 43 | — |
3 | — | 5.9 | WR60 | 6 | 3 | 44 | — |
4 | — | 12.4 | WR21 | 7 | 6 | 94 | — |
Earlier seasons (2025, 2024)
| WK | OPP | FPTS | RANK | TGT | REC | YD | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | MIN | 12.7 | WR21 | 9 | 6 | 37 | 1 |
2 | DET | 28.3 | WR4 | 11 | 7 | 128 | 2 |
3 | DAL | 13.7 | WR18 | 7 | 3 | 62 | 1 |
4 | LV | 14.9 | WR17 | 8 | 4 | 69 | 1 |
5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
6 | WAS | 4.2 | WR59 | 5 | 2 | 32 | — |
7 | NO | 4.1 | WR63 | 6 | 2 | 31 | — |
8 | BAL | 14.9 | WR11 | 10 | 7 | 114 | — |
9 | CIN | 0.0 | WR133 | 3 | — | — | — |
10 | NYG | 17.6 | WR10 | 10 | 6 | 86 | 1 |
11 | MIN | 5.1 | WR52 | 6 | 2 | 41 | — |
12 | PIT | 6.8 | WR38 | 9 | 3 | 53 | — |
13 | PHI | 1.8 | WR85 | 6 | 2 | 8 | — |
| WK | OPP | FPTS | RANK | TGT | REC | YD | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | TEN | 1.6 | WR93 | 4 | 1 | 11 | — |
2 | HOU | 4.3 | WR59 | 5 | 2 | 33 | — |
3 | IND | 20.4 | WR7 | 11 | 6 | 112 | 1 |
4 | LAR | 1.5 | WR96 | 3 | 1 | 10 | — |
5 | CAR | 6.5 | WR49 | 6 | 5 | 40 | — |
6 | JAX | 5.0 | WR56 | 2 | 2 | 40 | — |
7 | BYE | — | — | — | — | — | — |
8 | WAS | 6.9 | WR53 | 6 | 3 | 41 | — |
9 | ARI | 12.9 | WR23 | 7 | 5 | 104 | — |
10 | NE | 3.8 | WR63 | 6 | 3 | 23 | — |
11 | GB | 9.5 | WR35 | 10 | 6 | 65 | — |
12 | MIN | 6.4 | WR50 | 10 | 5 | 39 | — |
13 | DET | 3.5 | WR74 | 6 | 2 | 25 | — |
14 | SF | 18.2 | WR12 | 5 | 4 | 42 | 2 |
15 | MIN | 4.9 | WR59 | 7 | 2 | 39 | — |
16 | DET | 7.7 | WR51 | 7 | 4 | 77 | — |
17 | SEA | 2.0 | WR97 | 4 | 1 | 15 | — |
18 | GB | 2.8 | WR88 | 2 | 2 | 18 | — |
Expert takes
“While he didn’t post a massive stat line, Loveland had a 66.7% route share and 91% snap share as he led the team with a 26.5% target share and 34.8% first-read share. Loveland had three red zone targets, 57 receiving yards, and 2.38 YPRR. This week, Loveland faces a Green Bay secondary that has the sixth-highest two-high rate in the NFL (62.1%).”
FantasyPros Staff· Oct 8, 2026“The arrow is clearly pointing up for Loveland, who has a chance to become a bigger part of this offense as the season progresses. With the Bears potentially leaning on their passing game to keep pace with the Packers, Loveland could see another healthy dose of targets. I like the idea of using Loveland to save money as an alternative if you don’t want to pay full price for Trey McBride.”
Frank Ammirante· Oct 10, 2026“Last week, Loveland had an 11.8% target share, 31 receiving yards (1.35 YPRR), and a 10.3% first-read share. This is woeful usage for a player with his talent level. The Jets have held tight ends to the 13th-fewest yards per target and the eighth-fewest fantasy points per opportunity.”
Derek Brown· Oct 1, 2026
See 7 more
“TEs Colston Loveland has one catch for three yards through the first two weeks of the season. Caleb Williams ’ hamstring injury hurts all Bears pass-catchers, but Loveland turns into a player that I would advise starting with either Tyson Bagent or Case Keenum at QB. Tucker Kraft ’s return from a torn ACL has been slower than fantasy managers would have hoped for when drafting him, but the increase to 98% of snaps is a sign of encouragement.”
Jordan Pullett· Sep 25, 2026“Loveland may not mean as much to Ben Johnson ’s offense as Trey McBride or Brock Bowers mean to their offenses, limiting his ceiling when comparing him to the other elite TEs.”
Jordan Pullett· Sep 23, 2026“How crazy is it that Colston Loveland has combined for only one catch for three yards in two games? An absolutely insane outcome compared to the hype he was getting coming into the season. We have no choice but to downgrade Loveland moving forward, especially with Caleb Williams out for the foreseeable future.”
Frank Ammirante· Sep 23, 2026“I was always skeptical that Loveland would reach his elite ceiling, and he certainly hasn’t done anything to change that impression. If you can move him for a top-half TE1 price tag, do it.”
Ted Chmyz· Sep 23, 2026“Colston Loveland ‘s 0.05 YPRR is utterly painful considering he’s run the 6th most routes of any TE.”
Kyle Borgognoni· Sep 21, 2026“Chicago will be without quarterback Caleb Williams for the near future due to his hamstring injury, so the time to “buy low” on a potential bounce-back for Loveland is now.”
Evan Tarracciano· Sep 21, 2026“Loveland was always going to need consistent involvement AND reliable quarterback play to become the weekly TE1 fantasy managers drafted him to be. Unfortunately, the next man up for the Bears at QB is Tyson Bagent who hasn’t thrown a TD since 2023. As it stands, the panic alarm is screaming for Loveland.”
Tim Brosnan· Sep 21, 2026
“Odunze has only a 13.3% target share with 1.72 YPRR, two red zone targets, five deep targets, and a 13.1% first-read share. This week, he faces a Jets’ secondary that has the fifth-highest two-high rate in the NFL (65.4%). Against two-high, Odunze’s target-per-route run rate drops from 18% to 14%, and his yards per route run dips from 2.00 to 1.38.”
Derek Brown· Oct 1, 2026“According to Mando’s Targets Per Route Run report , Odunze has a 17.2% TPRR, which is 63rd among qualified receivers and below the position average. Luther Burden and Colston Loveland are also getting their share, so Odunze is more of a big-play option than a volume one. However, he is creating separation, which we love to see, so I am predicting an uptick in his utilization.”
Brittney Foxworth· Oct 9, 2026“Per Next Gen Stats…Odunze led the team in routes (31), catches (6, tied with Colston Loveland) and yards (94) for his best outing of the young season. He doesn’t lead the team in targets or catches this season, but does lead in yards (233) and air yards share (35.9%). Luther Burden caught 4 of 6 official targets (7 true) for 63 yards and carried once for 11 yards (a 17.6% official/18.4% adjusted target share.”
Andrew Erickson· Oct 6, 2026
See 11 more
“Rome Odunze has devolved into the “sacrificial X” for the Bears. He’s behind Luther Burden III and (shocker) Kalif Raymond in targets. I still have hope for him and Colston Loveland , but it’s quickly fading.”
Frank Ammirante· Sep 30, 2026“On top of that, Odunze has played 79.8% of his snaps out wide, where he will lock up with Mitchell and Woolen. Factoring all of that in, Odunze is a touchdown-dependent WR4/FLEX. Kalif Raymond Raymond still is not going away.”
Rich Hribar· Sep 24, 2026“In the meantime, his departure and the terrible weather overshadowed an important development: Another week removed from a preseason calf strain, Rome Odunze was the Bears’ clear No. 1 WR against the Vikings. Odunze’s 81% route share was 10% higher than that of the next-highest player, Kalif Raymond .”
Ted Chmyz· Sep 23, 2026“Rome Odunze was on his way to a breakout season before he sustained a foot fracture. In Weeks 1-12, he was the WR21 in fantasy points per game despite dealing with a 68.3% catchable target rate (96th out of 127 qualifying receivers). During that stretch of games, among that sample of receivers, he was 21st in target share (22.4%), 20th in receiving yards per game (59.4), 27th in yards per route run (1.95), 25th in first-read share (27.2%), and 16th in first-downs per route run (0.107).”
FantasyPros Staff· Sep 12, 2026“Rome Odunze (WR – CHI) After missing several games last year because of a foot injury, Rome Odunze is now dealing with another lower-body injury.”
Wolf Trelles-Heard· Sep 10, 2026“Rome Odunze (CHI) Odunze got off to one of the hottest starts last year.”
FantasyPros Staff· Sep 5, 2026“Rome Odunze (CHI) – ADP 61.2 | WR27 Odunze got off to one of the hottest starts last year. The former Washington star was the WR3 over the first four weeks, averaging 19.9 PPR fantasy points per game.”
Mike Fanelli· Sep 3, 2026“Odunze fits this mold. While Burden dominates the short-to-intermediate areas, Odunze would win downfield and rule the red zone. This creates an elite WR1 ceiling for Odunze, locking him in as a highly efficient TD machine.”
Nate Henry· Aug 28, 2026“Rome Odunze is coming off a foot injury, but he did play in the playoffs.”
Richard Janvrin· Aug 22, 2026“Bears wide receiver Luther Burden III is also dealing with some soft-tissue injuries that could hamper him, and Rome Odunze is coming off a foot injury (though he’s been cleared, it’s still worth noting).”
Richard Janvrin· Aug 22, 2026“Odunze remains a strong positive regression candidate tied to Caleb Williams , especially if the Bears’ passing game takes another step forward under HC Ben Johnson .”
FantasyPros Staff· Aug 18, 2026
Who scores most this week?
Choose your top 3 from upcoming games.
Tap players in order to build your rankings.