Christian Watson
vs Rome Odunze
2026 · Week 6 · Half-PPR
The crowd’s lean
Week 6No weekly comparisons recorded for this pair.
This week
WEEK 6Watson
vs DAL
Oct 18 · 8:20 PM ET
Odunze
at ATL
Oct 18 · 1:00 PM ET
15.3
Projected
8.5
Projected
Half-PPR
projection
This week's comparison isn't ready yet. Check back later.
2026 season, per game
2025 season, per game
Full game log & past seasons +
| WK | OPP | FPTS | RANK | TGT | REC | YD | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | — | 29.7 | WR2 | 8 | 6 | 147 | 2 |
2 | — | 12.1 | WR18 | 11 | 4 | 41 | 1 |
3 | — | 19.1 | WR6 | 10 | 7 | 96 | 1 |
4 | — | 6.2 | WR55 | 3 | 3 | 47 | — |
5 | — | 29.3 | WR1 | 8 | 6 | 143 | 2 |
Earlier seasons (2025, 2024)
| WK | OPP | FPTS | RANK | TGT | REC | YD | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
8 | PIT | 10.5 | WR30 | 4 | 4 | 85 | — |
9 | CAR | 6.8 | WR48 | 4 | 2 | 58 | — |
10 | PHI | 5.5 | WR47 | 4 | 2 | 45 | — |
11 | NYG | 18.6 | WR5 | 5 | 4 | 46 | 2 |
12 | MIN | 7.4 | WR36 | 7 | 5 | 49 | — |
13 | DET | 16.3 | WR12 | 10 | 4 | 80 | 1 |
14 | CHI | 22.9 | WR5 | 4 | 4 | 89 | 2 |
15 | DEN | 4.4 | WR67 | 5 | 3 | 29 | — |
16 | CHI | 2.7 | WR85 | 6 | 2 | 17 | — |
17 | BAL | 19.8 | WR5 | 6 | 5 | 113 | 1 |
| WK | OPP | FPTS | RANK | TGT | REC | YD | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | PHI | 8.8 | WR35 | 5 | 3 | 13 | 1 |
2 | IND | 0.0 | WR163 | — | — | — | — |
3 | TEN | 7.7 | WR46 | 2 | 2 | 67 | — |
4 | MIN | 0.0 | WR157 | 1 | — | — | — |
5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
6 | ARI | 14.3 | WR19 | 4 | 3 | 68 | 1 |
7 | HOU | 1.0 | WR100 | 2 | 1 | 9 | — |
8 | JAX | 5.9 | WR61 | 6 | 4 | 39 | — |
9 | DET | 7.2 | WR44 | 7 | 3 | 37 | — |
10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
11 | CHI | 17.0 | WR10 | 4 | 4 | 150 | — |
12 | SF | 0.4 | WR97 | 3 | — | — | — |
13 | MIA | 7.7 | WR44 | 4 | 2 | 67 | — |
14 | DET | 11.4 | WR28 | 7 | 4 | 114 | — |
15 | SEA | 7.1 | WR47 | 6 | 3 | 56 | — |
16 | NO | 2.3 | WR93 | 1 | — | — | — |
17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
18 | CHI | 0.0 | WR132 | 1 | — | — | — |
| WK | OPP | FPTS | RANK | TGT | REC | YD | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | — | 6.2 | WR50 | 3 | 2 | 52 | — |
2 | — | 5.8 | WR47 | 4 | 3 | 43 | — |
3 | — | 5.9 | WR60 | 6 | 3 | 44 | — |
4 | — | 12.4 | WR21 | 7 | 6 | 94 | — |
5 | — | 3.5 | WR67 | 9 | 3 | 40 | — |
Earlier seasons (2025, 2024)
| WK | OPP | FPTS | RANK | TGT | REC | YD | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | MIN | 12.7 | WR21 | 9 | 6 | 37 | 1 |
2 | DET | 28.3 | WR4 | 11 | 7 | 128 | 2 |
3 | DAL | 13.7 | WR18 | 7 | 3 | 62 | 1 |
4 | LV | 14.9 | WR17 | 8 | 4 | 69 | 1 |
5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
6 | WAS | 4.2 | WR59 | 5 | 2 | 32 | — |
7 | NO | 4.1 | WR63 | 6 | 2 | 31 | — |
8 | BAL | 14.9 | WR11 | 10 | 7 | 114 | — |
9 | CIN | 0.0 | WR133 | 3 | — | — | — |
10 | NYG | 17.6 | WR10 | 10 | 6 | 86 | 1 |
11 | MIN | 5.1 | WR52 | 6 | 2 | 41 | — |
12 | PIT | 6.8 | WR38 | 9 | 3 | 53 | — |
13 | PHI | 1.8 | WR85 | 6 | 2 | 8 | — |
| WK | OPP | FPTS | RANK | TGT | REC | YD | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | TEN | 1.6 | WR93 | 4 | 1 | 11 | — |
2 | HOU | 4.3 | WR59 | 5 | 2 | 33 | — |
3 | IND | 20.4 | WR7 | 11 | 6 | 112 | 1 |
4 | LAR | 1.5 | WR96 | 3 | 1 | 10 | — |
5 | CAR | 6.5 | WR49 | 6 | 5 | 40 | — |
6 | JAX | 5.0 | WR56 | 2 | 2 | 40 | — |
7 | BYE | — | — | — | — | — | — |
8 | WAS | 6.9 | WR53 | 6 | 3 | 41 | — |
9 | ARI | 12.9 | WR23 | 7 | 5 | 104 | — |
10 | NE | 3.8 | WR63 | 6 | 3 | 23 | — |
11 | GB | 9.5 | WR35 | 10 | 6 | 65 | — |
12 | MIN | 6.4 | WR50 | 10 | 5 | 39 | — |
13 | DET | 3.5 | WR74 | 6 | 2 | 25 | — |
14 | SF | 18.2 | WR12 | 5 | 4 | 42 | 2 |
15 | MIN | 4.9 | WR59 | 7 | 2 | 39 | — |
16 | DET | 7.7 | WR51 | 7 | 4 | 77 | — |
17 | SEA | 2.0 | WR97 | 4 | 1 | 15 | — |
18 | GB | 2.8 | WR88 | 2 | 2 | 18 | — |
Expert takes
“Watson is still the WR11 in expected points per game, so he still warrants WR1 consideration.”
Rich Hribar· Oct 14, 2026“That being said, I’m going with Watson because nobody seems to care about anything the Pack does, and Love to Watson is a thing. He’s fifth in receiving yards, second to JSN in touchdowns, and neck and neck ranking third in Fantasy points for WRs while his reception totals are two to three catches fewer per game than the other elite guys. Watson’s a big-play guy that nobody values.”
FantasyPros Staff· Oct 14, 2026“Per Next Gen Stats, Watson was pressured on 26 of 44 dropbacks for a 59.1% pressure rate, the second-highest pressure rate faced by Watson in a game since 2018 and the highest pressure rate generated by the Jets defense in a game since Aaron Glenn became head coach in 2025. LB Carson Schwesinger (lower leg) was seen in a walking boot after the Browns’ 17-12 loss to the Jets on Sunday.”
Andrew Erickson· Oct 13, 2026
See 9 more
“Watson has been the biggest beneficiary of quarterback Jordan Love ‘s propensity to look deep downfield, culminating in his 6/143/2 performance on Sunday against the Chicago Bears. Though his catch totals will never rival Justin Jefferson or Ja’Marr Chase , Watson more than makes up for it with his freakish size/speed combination and ability to box out defenders on downfield looks. Watson made several highlight-reel catches and is well on his way to his first 1,000-yard season if he can stay on the field.”
Evan Tarracciano· Oct 12, 2026“CHI | DraftKings: $6,400/FanDuel: $7,000 Christian Watson is one of my favorite wide receiver plays on this slate, especially if you’re already using Jordan Love at quarterback. The Packers have leaned heavily on their passing game this season. Watson gives Love a dangerous downfield weapon who can rack up fantasy points quickly .”
Frank Ammirante· Oct 10, 2026“Watson had only three targets, the fourth-most on the team, totaling two fewer than MarShawn Lloyd . Furthermore, Matthew Golden and Tucker Kraft led Green Bay with seven targets apiece. Even with leading the Packers in receiving yards (47), Watson scored only 7.7 fantasy points against the Tampa Bay Buccaneers.”
Mike Fanelli· Oct 8, 2026“Again, this two-game sample size for Washington is nothing to panic about, as Ja’Marr Chase , George Pickens , and Christian Watson are all within 1% of Washington’s 16% target share. This is just a reminder that Washington is not a tier-one WR in dynasty. Parker Washington has 4 REC in his last two games.”
Jordan Pullett· Oct 7, 2026“Knowing the current situation of Christian Watson , would you trade him away straight up for Matthew Golden ? – natedawg205 Answer: Oh look, another BOAT question, although this time we’re going from the 25-meter yacht to…well, a 20-meter one. The Ballers have waxed lyrical about both of these players this past week, and although Andy may have recommended trading Christian Watson away, I sure as heck would not advise packing him off in return for his teammate, even if Golden has seen more looks from Jordan Love on the year. Watson has more receptions (17-15), more yards (284-253), and most importantly…more TDs (4-1).”
PaulMarnie· Oct 3, 2026“Christian Watson scored four TDs in three weeks, and a dip in TDs would be detrimental to Watson’s fantasy production.”
Jordan Pullett· Oct 2, 2026“Christian Watson caught 7 of 10 targets for 96 yards and a touchdown — Green Bay’s opening score of the game. His share of the offense fell sharply week over week, but that’s because Matthew Golden’s target count exploded and the team threw 20 more times than last week. Target share fell sharply (33.3% → 18.9% adjusted) even though his raw target count only dropped by one (11 → 10).”
Andrew Erickson· Sep 29, 2026“Christian Watson (TRUST) Watson has opened the season with games of 6-147-2 (8 targets) and 4-41-1 (11 targets). Watson has played 82.6% and 93.8% of the dropbacks in the first two games, with target shares of 20% and 37.9%. With Jayden Reed going down last week, this passing tree became more concentrated.”
Rich Hribar· Sep 22, 2026“Watson played 77.4% of the snaps, ran 81.4% of the routes, and had a 19% target share. Second-year wideout Golden had 85.5% of the snaps, ran 88.4% of the routes, and had a 28.6% target share. Reed was last with 58.1% of the snaps, ran 67.4% of the routes, and had a 16.7% target share.”
Wyatt Bertolone· Sep 14, 2026
“Rome Odunze – 9 targets, 3 rec Odunze has seen his targets increase in each game so far this season. He is yet to catch a TD pass or surpass 100 receiving yards, but at least the targets are trending in the right direction. With Caleb Williams set to return as soon as Week 6, the targets in Chicago will likely become more valuable again.”
Aaron Larson· Oct 13, 2026“Against single high, Odunze has seen his target per route run rate increase from 18% to 19%, but his YPRR slightly fall from 1.83 to 1.69. Odunze could have a strong game this week against a Falcons secondary that has allowed the 12th-most yards per target and the fourth-most receiving fantasy points per game to perimeter wide receivers. Fantasy Football Flex & Deep Plays to Consider”
FantasyPros Staff· Oct 17, 2026“According to Mando’s Targets Per Route Run report , Odunze has a 17.2% TPRR, which is 63rd among qualified receivers and below the position average. Luther Burden and Colston Loveland are also getting their share, so Odunze is more of a big-play option than a volume one. However, he is creating separation, which we love to see, so I am predicting an uptick in his utilization.”
Brittney Foxworth· Oct 9, 2026
See 8 more
“Per Next Gen Stats…Odunze led the team in routes (31), catches (6, tied with Colston Loveland) and yards (94) for his best outing of the young season. He doesn’t lead the team in targets or catches this season, but does lead in yards (233) and air yards share (35.9%). Luther Burden caught 4 of 6 official targets (7 true) for 63 yards and carried once for 11 yards (a 17.6% official/18.4% adjusted target share.”
Andrew Erickson· Oct 6, 2026“Odunze has only a 13.3% target share with 1.72 YPRR, two red zone targets, five deep targets, and a 13.1% first-read share. This week, he faces a Jets’ secondary that has the fifth-highest two-high rate in the NFL (65.4%). Against two-high, Odunze’s target-per-route run rate drops from 18% to 14%, and his yards per route run dips from 2.00 to 1.38.”
Derek Brown· Oct 1, 2026“Rome Odunze has devolved into the “sacrificial X” for the Bears. He’s behind Luther Burden III and (shocker) Kalif Raymond in targets. I still have hope for him and Colston Loveland , but it’s quickly fading.”
Frank Ammirante· Sep 30, 2026“On top of that, Odunze has played 79.8% of his snaps out wide, where he will lock up with Mitchell and Woolen. Factoring all of that in, Odunze is a touchdown-dependent WR4/FLEX. Kalif Raymond Raymond still is not going away.”
Rich Hribar· Sep 24, 2026“In the meantime, his departure and the terrible weather overshadowed an important development: Another week removed from a preseason calf strain, Rome Odunze was the Bears’ clear No. 1 WR against the Vikings. Odunze’s 81% route share was 10% higher than that of the next-highest player, Kalif Raymond .”
Ted Chmyz· Sep 23, 2026“Rome Odunze was on his way to a breakout season before he sustained a foot fracture. In Weeks 1-12, he was the WR21 in fantasy points per game despite dealing with a 68.3% catchable target rate (96th out of 127 qualifying receivers). During that stretch of games, among that sample of receivers, he was 21st in target share (22.4%), 20th in receiving yards per game (59.4), 27th in yards per route run (1.95), 25th in first-read share (27.2%), and 16th in first-downs per route run (0.107).”
FantasyPros Staff· Sep 12, 2026“Rome Odunze (WR – CHI) After missing several games last year because of a foot injury, Rome Odunze is now dealing with another lower-body injury.”
Wolf Trelles-Heard· Sep 10, 2026“Rome Odunze (CHI) Odunze got off to one of the hottest starts last year.”
FantasyPros Staff· Sep 5, 2026
Who scores most this week?
Choose your top 3 from upcoming games.
Tap players in order to build your rankings.