Zay Flowers vs David Montgomery
2026 draft comparison · half-PPR
Updated Aug 29, 2026
Should you draft Zay Flowers or David Montgomery?
Last season — 2025, per game
Full game log & past seasons
| WK | OPP | FPTS | RANK | TGT | REC | YD | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | BUF | 24.6 | WR1 | 9 | 7 | 143 | 1 |
2 | CLE | 11.4 | WR31 | 11 | 7 | 75 | 0 |
3 | DET | 2.3 | WR89 | 3 | 2 | 13 | 0 |
4 | KC | 10.9 | WR26 | 8 | 7 | 74 | 0 |
5 | HOU | 9.7 | WR33 | 5 | 5 | 72 | 0 |
6 | LAR | 5.6 | WR47 | 10 | 6 | 46 | 0 |
7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
8 | CHI | 10.6 | WR28 | 9 | 7 | 63 | 0 |
9 | MIA | 8.9 | WR33 | 5 | 5 | 64 | 0 |
10 | MIN | 10.1 | WR30 | 6 | 4 | 75 | 0 |
11 | CLE | 9.8 | WR21 | 5 | 3 | 78 | 0 |
12 | NYJ | 9.4 | WR30 | 6 | 5 | 58 | 0 |
13 | CIN | -0.4 | WR158 | 7 | 2 | 6 | 0 |
14 | PIT | 16.6 | WR8 | 11 | 8 | 124 | 0 |
15 | CIN | 14.3 | WR17 | 5 | 3 | 68 | 1 |
16 | NE | 17.7 | WR10 | 7 | 7 | 84 | 0 |
17 | GB | 11.0 | WR24 | 5 | 4 | 30 | 1 |
18 | PIT | 27.8 | WR1 | 6 | 4 | 138 | 2 |
Earlier seasons (2024)
| WK | OPP | FPTS | RANK | TGT | REC | YD | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | KC | 8.1 | WR39 | 10 | 6 | 37 | 0 |
2 | LV | 18.6 | WR11 | 11 | 7 | 91 | 1 |
3 | DAL | 3.8 | WR73 | 4 | 3 | 20 | 0 |
4 | BUF | 1.5 | WR94 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 0 |
5 | CIN | 15.5 | WR15 | 12 | 7 | 111 | 0 |
6 | WAS | 17.9 | WR11 | 9 | 9 | 132 | 0 |
7 | TB | 3.5 | WR65 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 0 |
8 | CLE | 15.0 | WR17 | 12 | 7 | 115 | 0 |
9 | DEN | 27.2 | WR2 | 6 | 5 | 127 | 2 |
10 | CIN | 5.4 | WR50 | 6 | 4 | 34 | 0 |
11 | PIT | 10.9 | WR31 | 6 | 2 | 39 | 1 |
12 | LAC | 8.7 | WR33 | 8 | 5 | 62 | 0 |
13 | PHI | 8.6 | WR41 | 7 | 3 | 74 | 0 |
14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
15 | NYG | 8.3 | WR38 | 7 | 6 | 53 | 0 |
16 | PIT | 12.8 | WR23 | 8 | 5 | 100 | 0 |
17 | HOU | 4.1 | WR71 | 5 | 2 | 31 | 0 |
18 | CLE | 2.6 | WR89 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 0 |
| WK | OPP | FPTS | RANK | ATT | YD | TD | TGT | REC | RYD | RTD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | GB | 6.3 | RB35 | 11 | 25 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 18 | 0 |
2 | CHI | 12.6 | RB23 | 11 | 57 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 |
3 | BAL | 28.9 | RB2 | 12 | 151 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 0 |
4 | CLE | 1.2 | RB62 | 9 | 12 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
5 | CIN | 17.7 | RB9 | 18 | 65 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 |
6 | KC | 7.1 | RB25 | 4 | 24 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 37 | 0 |
7 | TB | 4.9 | RB36 | 13 | 21 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 18 | 0 |
8 | BYE | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
9 | MIN | 10.0 | RB21 | 11 | 40 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 10 | 0 |
10 | WAS | 9.6 | RB25 | 15 | 71 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
11 | PHI | 4.2 | RB43 | 6 | 27 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 0 |
12 | NYG | 5.2 | RB36 | 5 | 18 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 19 | 0 |
13 | GB | 11.8 | RB22 | 8 | 32 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 16 | 0 |
14 | DAL | 13.8 | RB15 | 6 | 60 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 0 |
15 | LAR | 9.2 | RB30 | 7 | 32 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
16 | PIT | 1.4 | RB63 | 4 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
17 | MIN | 5.0 | RB40 | 10 | 25 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 15 | 0 |
18 | CHI | 6.0 | RB35 | 8 | 42 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 0 |
Earlier seasons (2024)
| WK | OPP | FPTS | RANK | ATT | YD | TD | TGT | REC | RYD | RTD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | LAR | 15.8 | RB14 | 17 | 91 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
2 | TB | 15.0 | RB13 | 11 | 35 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 35 | 0 |
3 | ARI | 19.7 | RB8 | 23 | 105 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 17 | 0 |
4 | SEA | 14.5 | RB18 | 12 | 40 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 40 | 0 |
5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
6 | DAL | 20.5 | RB5 | 12 | 80 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
7 | MIN | 6.5 | RB35 | 9 | 31 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 39 | 0 |
8 | TEN | 14.4 | RB17 | 9 | 33 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 |
9 | GB | 11.1 | RB24 | 17 | 73 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 23 | 0 |
10 | HOU | 12.1 | RB16 | 12 | 32 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 24 | 0 |
11 | JAX | 23.0 | RB4 | 15 | 75 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 20 | 0 |
12 | IND | 14.8 | RB10 | 8 | 37 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 36 | 0 |
13 | CHI | 13.9 | RB15 | 21 | 88 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 36 | 0 |
14 | GB | 16.9 | RB10 | 14 | 51 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 33 | 0 |
15 | BUF | 5.5 | RB37 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 31 | 0 |
Latest takes
“Zay Flowers (WR – BAL) “I’m smelling the flowers and want Zay on all my teams if I can get him. I’ve been high on Baltimore’s WR1 all offseason, and it seems like the Ravens are too after giving him a four-year, $140-million extension recently.”
FantasyPros Staff· Aug 27“Zay Flowers will be the focal point of the passing attack, leading Baltimore in targets. However, Lane is competing with Rashod Bateman and an aging Mark Andrews for the No.”
Mike Fanelli· Aug 25“He now works behind a reworked offensive line with a new playcaller and a thin receiving corps behind Zay Flowers and Mark Andrews . The QB1 ceiling is real, but at a top-two quarterback price the market is baking that ceiling in as a near certainty when it is anything but.”
FantasyPros Staff· Aug 25
See 12 more
“There’s a world where Zay Flowers has the talent to be a top-5 fantasy WR if he can ever score TDs. Over 1,200 yards. 86 catches and 5 TDs (WR7) in 2025.”
FantasyPros Staff· Aug 25“Head coach Todd Monken spent the past three years coaching Zay Flowers in Baltimore and should see similarities with Concepcion. Last season, the former Texas A&M star had the fifth-highest yards after the catch average (7.”
Mike Fanelli· Aug 23“Zay Flowers dominated Baltimore’s passing game in 2025 and remains Lamar Jackson’s most trusted target.”
Lawrence Iacona· Aug 19“Zay Flowers (WR – BAL) “ Zay Flowers is being drafted as WR17, which is a bit of a head scratcher considering he finished as WR12 in PPG for receivers that played more than half the year (WR14 if not).”
FantasyPros Staff· Aug 11“Flowers posted 86 catches, 1,211 yards, and six total touchdowns last year despite playing for a team that threw the fewest passes in the league over the last three years.”
FantasyPros Staff· Aug 10“Zay Flowers (WR – BAL) is set up for touchdown regression in the best way. Every other receiver who topped 1,200 receiving yards last year scored at least eight touchdowns except him.”
FantasyPros Staff· Aug 10“Zay Flowers is a popular target of the fantasy community due to his ability to separate from defenders, along with Declan Doyle’s new offense. Camp reports have been extremely positive, with a lot of talk that Flowers will be the absolute focal point of this Ravens’ passing game.”
Frank Ammirante· Aug 9“Isaiah Likely is gone, and I don’t think Ja’Kobi Lane or Elijah Sarratt provide the level of incentive to keep me off of drafting the guy who has been the other boundary target next to Zay Flowers for years now.”
Tony Martin· Jul 30“The Fantasy Hitman grabbed his beloved Zay Flowers to be his WR2.”
Kurt Mullen· Jul 29“The Ballers really like Zay Flowers , who will serve as the primary pre-snap chess piece operating from the Z-receiver spot. This alignment keeps him off the line of scrimmage to dodge press coverage while creating misdirection.”
Vernon Meighan· Jul 27“The Declan Doyle addition makes me more bullish on Flowers, who was the entire Ravens’ passing game last season.”
Jeff Krisko· Jul 23“Yet, Zay Flowers’ role as the clear-cut No. 1 option in the passing game remains unchallenged.”
Mike Fanelli· Jul 18
“David Montgomery (RB – HOU) When Houston added David Montgomery on a two-year, $16.5 million deal to pry him away from Detroit, I was hopeful that the Texans would allow him to immediately slide into a featured role. One where he would dominate the backfield touches for the team, operating as the clear-cut No. 1 RB for the first time since his days with the Chicago Bears.”
Evan Tarracciano· Aug 28“David Montgomery (RB – HOU) “ David Montgomery landed in a great situation in Houston! He is running behind a much-improved, revamped line.”
FantasyPros Staff· Aug 27“In seven seasons, Montgomery only has two 1,000-yard rushing seasons. However, he has finished as a top-24 RB in six of them.”
Colt Williams· Aug 27
See 12 more
“In addition to the headline question, I was asked about keeping David Montgomery for a sixth-round pick in half-PPR leagues.”
Josh Shepardson· Aug 22“Round 6: David Montgomery (RB – HOU) David Montgomery was traded to the Houston Texans, and he’ll immediately bolster their backfield.”
Richard Janvrin· Aug 22“It’s no surprise that David Montgomery believes he can be a lead back in the NFL and carry a full workload.”
Ellis Johnson· Aug 19“added much-needed help to the offensive line and a dependable lead-back in David Montgomery .”
Kyle Lesti· Aug 11“With the Lions losing David Montgomery , that should open up some extra touches in the offense, and Jameson can see a handful of those.” – Muntradamus ( Beast Dome ) “I like a lot of WRs in this range, so I’m going to go with one of the more affordable options in Jameson Williams , whose current ADP is at WR 25.”
FantasyPros Staff· Aug 11“David Montgomery (RB – HOU) With a stable workload and an undervalued draft price, David Montgomery is a clear choice to draft in the middle rounds.”
Lawrence Iacona· Aug 11“The biggest reason Gibbs should be the RB1 is that he no longer shares the backfield with David Montgomery .”
Kyle Zeigler· Aug 10“David Montgomery, Tyler Allgeier, Jacory Croskey-Merritt, Kareem Hunt, Jalen Hurts – 8 Jordan Love is the only QB in the last decade to:”
The FF Newsletter· Aug 6“David Montgomery (RB – HOU) At this point in the draft, I didn’t have a running back yet, so I wanted to start taking swings on players I felt had starter upside, and David Montgomery is definitely one of them”
Richard Janvrin· Aug 6“Last season, Montgomery bested Marks in explosive run rate, missed tackle rate, rushing success rate, yards after contact per attempt, and yards per route run. Legit, every per-touch metric that I care about. Montgomery is the superior back, even at this stage of his career, and he’ll be a strong volume-driven RB2 that could flirt with RB1 production.”
FantasyPros Staff· Aug 4“David Montgomery now finds himself as the Texans’ do it all workhorse for 2026. Last year, he was phased out of the Lions’ offensive plans as the season moved along, which led to his RB32 finish in fantasy points per game. In Weeks 12-18, he was the RB43 in fantasy points per game with a 32.1% snap rate, 8.2 touches per game, and only 42.8 total yards per game.”
FantasyPros Staff· Aug 4“A Case Study at the Round 4 Turn Currently in best ball ADP, DJ Moore and David Montgomery are priced right next to each other, with average draft positions of 47 and 48, as of July 27th.”
Tony Martin· Jul 30