Travis Etienne
vs Josh Jacobs
2026 · Week 5 · Half-PPR
The crowd’s lean
Week 5No weekly comparisons recorded for this pair.
This week
WEEK 5Etienne
vs MIN
Oct 11 · 1:00 PM ET
IR
Jacobs
vs CHI
Oct 11 · 1:00 PM ET
NA
—
Projected
—
Projected
Half-PPR
projection
This week's comparison isn't ready yet. Check back later.
2026 season, per game
2025 season, per game
Full game log & past seasons +
| WK | OPP | FPTS | RANK | ATT | YD | TD | TGT | REC | RYD | RTD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | — | 11.3 | RB23 | 9 | 46 | — | 9 | 7 | 32 | — |
2 | — | 6.1 | RB35 | 8 | 25 | — | 2 | 2 | 6 | — |
3 | — | 8.0 | RB29 | 13 | 57 | — | 2 | 2 | 13 | — |
4 | — | 0.0 | RB163 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earlier seasons (2025, 2024)
| WK | OPP | FPTS | RANK | ATT | YD | TD | TGT | REC | RYD | RTD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | CAR | 17.1 | RB6 | 16 | 143 | — | 3 | 3 | 13 | — |
2 | CIN | 15.9 | RB12 | 14 | 71 | — | 3 | 2 | 18 | 1 |
3 | HOU | 11.6 | RB18 | 16 | 56 | 1 | 2 | — | — | — |
4 | SF | 19.0 | RB12 | 19 | 124 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | — |
5 | KC | 7.3 | RB30 | 12 | 49 | — | 4 | 3 | 9 | — |
6 | SEA | 7.5 | RB22 | 12 | 27 | — | 5 | 4 | 28 | — |
7 | LAR | 6.0 | RB32 | 8 | 44 | — | 3 | 1 | 11 | — |
8 | BYE | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
9 | LV | 14.0 | RB10 | 22 | 84 | — | 5 | 5 | 31 | — |
10 | HOU | 14.7 | RB11 | 16 | 58 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 19 | — |
11 | LAC | 19.3 | RB6 | 19 | 73 | 2 | 2 | — | — | — |
12 | ARI | 19.1 | RB7 | 15 | 86 | — | 4 | 3 | 30 | 1 |
13 | TEN | 4.6 | RB48 | 12 | 28 | — | 1 | 1 | 13 | — |
14 | IND | 20.7 | RB4 | 20 | 74 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 8 | — |
15 | NYJ | 30.0 | RB2 | 12 | 32 | — | 4 | 3 | 73 | 3 |
16 | DEN | 14.6 | RB19 | 16 | 50 | — | 5 | 4 | 16 | 1 |
17 | IND | 10.2 | RB21 | 17 | 76 | — | 3 | 2 | 16 | — |
18 | TEN | 4.3 | RB49 | 14 | 32 | — | 1 | 1 | 6 | — |
| WK | OPP | FPTS | RANK | ATT | YD | TD | TGT | REC | RYD | RTD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | MIA | 10.9 | RB28 | 12 | 44 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 15 | — |
2 | CLE | 13.3 | RB20 | 13 | 52 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 6 | — |
3 | BUF | 10.5 | RB21 | 11 | 68 | — | 6 | 4 | 17 | — |
4 | HOU | 6.5 | RB39 | 11 | 50 | — | 2 | 1 | 10 | — |
5 | IND | 9.0 | RB29 | 6 | 17 | — | 7 | 6 | 43 | — |
6 | CHI | -0.1 | RB84 | 3 | -1 | — | 1 | — | — | — |
7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
8 | BYE | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
9 | PHI | 4.0 | RB46 | 3 | 24 | — | 3 | 2 | 6 | — |
10 | MIN | 4.8 | RB40 | 11 | 44 | — | 1 | 1 | -1 | — |
11 | DET | 4.8 | RB35 | 12 | 27 | — | 3 | 3 | 6 | — |
12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
13 | HOU | 7.3 | RB36 | 13 | 46 | — | 3 | 3 | 12 | — |
14 | TEN | 9.0 | RB28 | 4 | 20 | — | 4 | 4 | 50 | — |
15 | NYJ | 10.5 | RB22 | 14 | 65 | — | 5 | 4 | 20 | — |
16 | LV | 4.7 | RB45 | 9 | 22 | — | 3 | 2 | 15 | — |
17 | TEN | 8.0 | RB28 | 15 | 49 | — | 2 | 1 | 26 | — |
18 | IND | 7.5 | RB34 | 13 | 31 | — | 5 | 3 | 29 | — |
| WK | OPP | FPTS | RANK | ATT | YD | TD | TGT | REC | RYD | RTD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | — | 0.0 | RB143 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
2 | — | 0.0 | RB116 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
3 | — | 0.0 | RB80 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
4 | — | 0.0 | RB90 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earlier seasons (2025, 2024)
| WK | OPP | FPTS | RANK | ATT | YD | TD | TGT | REC | RYD | RTD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | DET | 13.5 | RB14 | 19 | 66 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | — |
2 | WAS | 14.4 | RB17 | 23 | 84 | 1 | — | — | — | — |
3 | CLE | 9.9 | RB23 | 16 | 30 | — | 9 | 5 | 44 | — |
4 | DAL | 29.7 | RB2 | 22 | 86 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 71 | — |
5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
6 | CIN | 29.5 | RB4 | 18 | 93 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 57 | — |
7 | ARI | 18.3 | RB7 | 13 | 55 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | — |
8 | PIT | 12.0 | RB19 | 13 | 33 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 12 | — |
9 | CAR | 18.0 | RB4 | 17 | 87 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 13 | — |
10 | PHI | 17.2 | RB9 | 21 | 74 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 33 | — |
11 | NYG | 4.0 | RB45 | 7 | 40 | — | 1 | — | — | — |
12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
13 | DET | 9.6 | RB31 | 17 | 83 | — | 1 | 1 | 8 | — |
14 | CHI | 16.2 | RB11 | 20 | 86 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 | — |
15 | DEN | 22.2 | RB6 | 12 | 73 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 19 | 1 |
16 | CHI | 3.8 | RB54 | 12 | 36 | — | 2 | 2 | 12 | — |
17 | BAL | 0.8 | RB67 | 4 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| WK | OPP | FPTS | RANK | ATT | YD | TD | TGT | REC | RYD | RTD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | PHI | 11.4 | RB26 | 16 | 84 | — | 3 | 2 | 20 | — |
2 | IND | 13.1 | RB22 | 32 | 151 | — | — | — | — | — |
3 | TEN | 5.3 | RB44 | 14 | 43 | — | 1 | 1 | 5 | — |
4 | MIN | 9.8 | RB25 | 9 | 51 | — | 6 | 4 | 27 | — |
5 | LAR | 15.9 | RB8 | 19 | 73 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 21 | — |
6 | ARI | 10.5 | RB23 | 18 | 62 | — | 3 | 3 | 28 | — |
7 | HOU | 17.7 | RB14 | 12 | 76 | — | 5 | 5 | 16 | 1 |
8 | JAX | 25.0 | RB2 | 25 | 127 | 2 | 2 | 1 | -2 | — |
9 | DET | 11.8 | RB21 | 13 | 95 | — | 3 | 2 | 13 | — |
10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
11 | CHI | 21.4 | RB5 | 18 | 76 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 58 | — |
12 | SF | 28.6 | RB2 | 26 | 106 | 3 | 1 | — | — | — |
13 | MIA | 19.7 | RB6 | 19 | 43 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 74 | — |
14 | DET | 24.6 | RB3 | 18 | 66 | 3 | — | — | — | — |
15 | SEA | 19.6 | RB6 | 26 | 94 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 42 | — |
16 | NO | 18.7 | RB14 | 13 | 69 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 38 | — |
17 | MIN | 10.9 | RB15 | 17 | 69 | 1 | — | — | — | — |
18 | CHI | 11.1 | RB19 | 6 | 44 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | — |
Expert takes
“De’Von Achane and Travis Etienne are out this week.”
Edward DeLauter· Oct 3, 2026“Underhill also reports RB Travis Etienne is going on injured reserve with a hamstring injury.”
Tony Camino· Oct 1, 2026“Per Mike Triplett , Saints HC Kellen Moore said RB Travis Etienne will miss time with a hamstring injury.”
Tony Camino· Sep 28, 2026
See 11 more
“Etienne has posted a respectable 11.8% explosive run rate and 18% missed tackle rate. Etienne could be an RB2 with a bad matchup this week, but he’s best viewed as a risky flex at this point until his usage improves. The Raiders have allowed the tenth-lowest explosive run rate, the seventh-lowest rushing success rate, and the fourth-lowest missed tackle rate.”
FantasyPros Staff· Sep 24, 2026“Kamara is clearly the more involved receiver (6 targets to Etienne’s 2); Etienne is the marginally more efficient runner (3.1 vs. 1.7 YPC). First-half usage: Kamara handled the bulk of it — 5 carries for 10 yards across Q1-Q2 (all of Q2’s carries were his) vs. just 2 carries for 9 yards for Etienne (both in Q1, on the opening drive).”
Andrew Erickson· Sep 22, 2026“As long as this offense funnels heavily through Chris Olave , Etienne looks like a completely non-useful fantasy asset who is utterly dependent on TD efficiency to crack your starting lineup. Conclusion: Sell Travis Etienne Jr . if you still can. IMAGN IMAGES via Reuters Connect Cleveland Browns Denzel Boston (93%) It is time to officially sound the breakout alarm for rookie second-rounder Denzel Boston .”
Nate Henry· Sep 22, 2026“I noted on the Friday DFS Pod that I thought Travis Etienne was a really interesting leverage play as he was essentially the only Saints player not getting steamed up this week. Once Alvin Kamara was ruled out (Knee), I thought Etienne became an even better play given that we could project a bump in his pass catching role. Again, the result didn’t go my way here with Shough passing stacks getting that insane come-from-behind pass volume, but I was really happy with my ownership read, getting him at just 12% in this contest.”
Chris Cash· Sep 14, 2026“It’s easily Travis Etienne for me, and I’m struggling to understand why we’re still getting him at RB17. Etienne was the RB6 in points per game in 2023 and RB12 last season, and his career 13.2 PPG is essentially identical to Kenneth Walker ‘s 13.3.”
FantasyPros Staff· Sep 2, 2026“” – Adam Dove ( The Fantasy Couriers ) Travis Etienne Jr. (RB – NO) “ Travis Etienne is sitting around RB18 in Half-PPR ECR after finishing as the RB13 in points per game last season and putting up 1,399 total yards.”
FantasyPros Staff· Aug 30, 2026“He signed a massive deal with the Saints this offseason after rushing 260 times for 1,107 yards and seven touchdowns last season, while also catching 36 passes for 292 yards and six more scores. Etienne will get plenty of action in the passing game and will be the team’s undisputed No. 1 RB.”
Richard Janvrin· Aug 18, 2026“Travis Etienne Jr. bounced back in a big way last season, amassing 1,100 rushing yards and seven rushing touchdowns for the Jaguars. He's headed into arguably an even better situation in New Orleans, at least in terms of backfield competition. Etienne posted an RB10 overall finish in 2025 with a 65.1% snap share. If that climbs up closer to the 75% range in New Orleans (which feels realistic given the depth chart), I don't see why he can't hit 1,500 rushing yards.”
Jim Moorman· Jul 6, 2026“The Saints signed Travis Etienne to headline their backfield, but among 43 running backs with at least 150 touches last season, Etienne was 27th in yards per carry (4.3) and 33rd in percentage of rushes that went for zero or negative yards.”
Josh Shepardson· Jul 1, 2026“Etienne is too good a talent for the Saints to put him in a legitimate time share of any kind. Kellen Moore's offense has been capable of producing big fantasy numbers for running backs as well.”
Jason Kamlowsky· Jun 14, 2026“Travis Etienne is a free agent in 2026 (signed with the New Orleans Saints). They did draft two RBs in last year's draft, likely knowing they could lose ETN on the open market.”
Andrew Erickson· Mar 22, 2026
“Josh Jacobs, Green Bay (78% rostered) The video tape evidence against Josh Jacobs is set to be released to the NFL at some point. He won’t play again this season. MarShawn Lloyd, Green Bay (72% rostered) The Packers gambled that the above would not be true, and lost.”
Jeff Krisko· Sep 29, 2026“The Packers’ pass rate in the absence of Josh Jacobs is also a big reason for their success. The Packers ranked 28th in pass rate last season at 52%, and have jumped to second in pass rate this season at 66.7%, behind the Houston Texans . Golden’s stock dropped over the course of the 2025 season as he was never a focal point of Green Bay’s offense.”
Jordan Pullett· Sep 23, 2026“Insiders believe that Jacobs could be back as early as Week 5 once the NFL clears his suspension review, with time on the NFI list counting as time toward any suspension. With a murky committee in place for the next couple of weeks, there is absolutely no reason to chase anyone in this backfield on the waiver wire. Conclusion: Avoid the Green Bay committee; Chris Brooks is a snap-share mirage, and Josh Jacobs will reclaim his kingdom soon.”
Nate Henry· Sep 22, 2026
See 12 more
“Jacobs was originally booked on five charges, including strangulation, but instead faced reduced charges of misdemeanor battery and criminal damage to property. Generally speaking, the NFL has a six-game minimum suspension length for incidents of domestic violence. Jacobs, 28, was selected with the No. 24 overall pick by the Raiders out of Alabama in 2019.”
Logan Ulrich· Sep 13, 2026“5% Josh Jacobs is on the commissioner’s exempt list, which suddenly puts Lloyd in position to lead GB’s backfield with limited NFL experience.”
Chris Cash· Sep 11, 2026“Based on the NFL’s statement, though, there is still no timeline for clarity to emerge regarding how much time Jacobs will miss during the regular season. As noted by Mark Maske of Front Office Sports , any games Jacobs spends on the commissioner’s exempt list before a ban were to be handed down would count toward his suspension. Players typically lose their game checks for each contest missed through suspension, but Maske adds Jacobs would have his pay returned for any games sidelined on the exempt list prior to a suspension being handed down.”
Adam La Rose· Sep 11, 2026“The legal situation swirling around Josh Jacobs will definitely put a crimp into the plans of how the Packers operate, forcing oft-injured MarShawn Lloyd to become the de facto top running back instead.”
Evan Tarracciano· Sep 4, 2026“Josh Jacobs was placed on the Commissioner's Exempt List, and his availability is unknown.”
Curtis Hirsch· Aug 31, 2026“Josh Jacobs is one of the easiest running backs to target on Fantrax if he slips to his ADP of 40. At a 32 ADP on FantasyPros, that is eight picks later than other sites. Jacobs has already demonstrated a high-end fantasy ceiling and a true workhorse role in Green Bay.”
Ryan Kirksey· Aug 24, 2026“Round 13: MarShawn Lloyd (RB – GB) Josh Jacobs could still be suspended by the NFL, allowing MarShawn Lloyd a chance to get on the field.”
Richard Janvrin· Aug 22, 2026“If healthy, Jacobs has a top-5 fantasy ceiling. But as the 28-year-old continues to pile up volume and small injuries, fantasy managers should be wary of the production tapering off.”
FantasyPros Staff· Aug 11, 2026“Josh Jacobs (RB – GB) Going as the RB14, 21st overall, Jacobs is projected for 289 carries, 1,161 rushing yards, and 12 rushing touchdowns, plus another 36 catches and roughly one receiving touchdown. Health was the story that took some shine off last season, as a knee bruise and thigh injury limited him over the second half.”
FantasyPros Staff· Aug 8, 2026“Josh Jacobs was involved in an offseason domestic incident that is reportedly still under investigation, though no charges have been filed.”
Curtis Hirsch· Aug 5, 2026“1 | Diff: +5 Josh Jacobs has been the RB8 and RB9 in fantasy points per game during his two seasons in Green Bay.”
FantasyPros Staff· Aug 5, 2026“Josh Jacobs might be the biggest value in early fantasy football drafts. Despite finishing as a productive fantasy back last season, Jacobs is currently being drafted outside the top 12 running backs in many formats. The case is simple: Green Bay trusts Jacobs near the goal line, he remains heavily involved as an early-down runner, and his receiving floor is underrated.”
FantasyPros Staff· May 10, 2026
Who scores most this week?
Choose your top 3 from upcoming games.
Tap players in order to build your rankings.