Drake London vs Lamar Jackson
2026 draft comparison · half-PPR
Updated Aug 10, 2026
Should you draft Drake London or Lamar Jackson?
Last season — 2025, per game
Full game log & past seasons
| WK | OPP | FPTS | RANK | TGT | REC | YD | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | TB | 9.5 | WR29 | 15 | 8 | 55 | 0 |
2 | MIN | 4.4 | WR76 | 4 | 3 | 49 | 0 |
3 | CAR | 8.0 | WR38 | 8 | 5 | 55 | 0 |
4 | WAS | 21.0 | WR6 | 10 | 8 | 110 | 1 |
5 | BYE | — | — | — | — | — | — |
6 | BUF | 26.8 | WR2 | 16 | 10 | 158 | 1 |
7 | SF | 6.2 | WR46 | 10 | 4 | 42 | 0 |
8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
9 | NE | 34.3 | WR1 | 14 | 9 | 118 | 3 |
10 | IND | 21.4 | WR1 | 8 | 6 | 104 | 1 |
11 | CAR | 15.4 | WR12 | 9 | 7 | 119 | 0 |
12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
16 | ARI | 4.2 | WR70 | 8 | 3 | 27 | 0 |
17 | LAR | 0.9 | WR115 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 0 |
18 | NO | 15.8 | WR8 | 8 | 4 | 78 | 1 |
Earlier seasons (2024)
| WK | OPP | FPTS | RANK | TGT | REC | YD | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | PIT | 2.5 | WR81 | 3 | 2 | 15 | 0 |
2 | PHI | 14.4 | WR18 | 7 | 6 | 54 | 1 |
3 | KC | 15.7 | WR18 | 9 | 6 | 67 | 1 |
4 | NO | 9.4 | WR38 | 12 | 6 | 64 | 0 |
5 | TB | 27.4 | WR2 | 13 | 12 | 154 | 1 |
6 | CAR | 16.4 | WR14 | 10 | 6 | 74 | 1 |
7 | SEA | 15.3 | WR9 | 8 | 6 | 63 | 1 |
8 | TB | 5.4 | WR64 | 6 | 4 | 34 | 0 |
9 | DAL | 9.7 | WR32 | 2 | 2 | 27 | 1 |
10 | NO | 13.7 | WR15 | 13 | 8 | 97 | 0 |
11 | DEN | 7.6 | WR45 | 7 | 3 | 61 | 0 |
12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
13 | LAC | 12.8 | WR25 | 16 | 9 | 86 | 0 |
14 | MIN | 9.5 | WR33 | 10 | 5 | 70 | 0 |
15 | LV | 12.8 | WR27 | 3 | 3 | 53 | 1 |
16 | NYG | 8.4 | WR45 | 8 | 5 | 59 | 0 |
17 | WAS | 14.1 | WR25 | 13 | 7 | 106 | 0 |
18 | CAR | 35.7 | WR1 | 18 | 10 | 187 | 2 |
| WK | OPP | FPTS | RANK | ATT | CMP | YD | TD | INT | RuYD | RuTD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | BUF | 29.4 | QB4 | 19 | 14 | 209 | 2 | 0 | 70 | 1 |
2 | CLE | 26.3 | QB3 | 29 | 19 | 225 | 4 | 0 | 13 | 0 |
3 | DET | 27.0 | QB3 | 27 | 21 | 288 | 3 | 0 | 35 | 0 |
4 | KC | 11.7 | QB27 | 20 | 14 | 147 | 1 | 1 | 48 | 0 |
5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
9 | MIA | 25.6 | QB9 | 23 | 18 | 204 | 4 | 0 | 14 | 0 |
10 | MIN | 16.6 | QB15 | 29 | 17 | 176 | 1 | 0 | 36 | 0 |
11 | CLE | 6.7 | QB29 | 25 | 14 | 193 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 0 |
12 | NYJ | 7.2 | QB25 | 23 | 13 | 153 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 0 |
13 | CIN | 7.5 | QB27 | 32 | 17 | 246 | 0 | 1 | 27 | 0 |
14 | PIT | 22.1 | QB7 | 35 | 19 | 219 | 1 | 1 | 43 | 1 |
15 | CIN | 15.6 | QB20 | 12 | 8 | 150 | 2 | 1 | 26 | 0 |
16 | NE | 4.7 | QB29 | 10 | 7 | 101 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 |
17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
18 | PIT | 21.4 | QB7 | 18 | 11 | 238 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 0 |
Earlier seasons (2024)
| WK | OPP | FPTS | RANK | ATT | CMP | YD | TD | INT | RuYD | RuTD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | KC | 25.1 | QB5 | 41 | 26 | 273 | 1 | 0 | 122 | 0 |
2 | LV | 17.4 | QB9 | 34 | 21 | 247 | 1 | 1 | 45 | 0 |
3 | DAL | 26.0 | QB4 | 15 | 12 | 182 | 1 | 0 | 87 | 1 |
4 | BUF | 23.6 | QB6 | 18 | 13 | 156 | 2 | 0 | 54 | 1 |
5 | CIN | 33.4 | QB3 | 42 | 26 | 348 | 4 | 0 | 55 | 0 |
6 | WAS | 19.9 | QB12 | 26 | 20 | 323 | 1 | 1 | 40 | 0 |
7 | TB | 34.4 | QB1 | 22 | 17 | 281 | 5 | 0 | 52 | 0 |
8 | CLE | 24.2 | QB8 | 38 | 23 | 289 | 2 | 0 | 46 | 0 |
9 | DEN | 23.6 | QB6 | 19 | 16 | 280 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 0 |
10 | CIN | 32.9 | QB2 | 33 | 25 | 290 | 4 | 0 | 33 | 0 |
11 | PIT | 15.9 | QB23 | 33 | 16 | 207 | 1 | 1 | 46 | 0 |
12 | LAC | 22.6 | QB5 | 22 | 16 | 177 | 2 | 0 | 15 | 1 |
13 | PHI | 25.4 | QB6 | 36 | 23 | 237 | 2 | 0 | 79 | 0 |
14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
15 | NYG | 36.1 | QB3 | 25 | 21 | 290 | 5 | 0 | 65 | 0 |
16 | PIT | 21.5 | QB12 | 23 | 15 | 207 | 3 | 1 | 22 | 0 |
17 | HOU | 29.4 | QB6 | 15 | 10 | 168 | 2 | 0 | 87 | 1 |
18 | CLE | 23.0 | QB10 | 32 | 16 | 217 | 2 | 0 | 63 | 0 |
Latest takes
“The Falcons also just gave WR Drake London a deal worth a little over $35 million annually, so that seems like the range that Flowers’ deal will slot into .”
Logan Ulrich· Jul 19“London was on a tear before a PCL injury blunted his momentum and his statistical finish to the season. He topped 100 yards receiving in five out of nine games to start the season before the injury, then had 109 yards and a touchdown combined over the final three after he returned.”
Logan Ulrich· Jul 19“London was on his way to another stellar season in 2025 before a PCL injury in Week 11 derailed him, limiting him to 12 games. On a per-game basis, London averaged 5.7 receptions (WR8) for 76.6 yards (WR7) with 7 touchdowns.”
Rich Hribar· Jul 10
See 9 more
“London was cooking last year before a PCL injury derailed his season in Week 11. In Weeks 1-10 last year, London was the WR6 in fantasy points per game. During that stretch, he was fourth in target share (30.3%), fourth in receiving yards per game (86.4), sixth in yards per route run (2.74), fifth in first-read share (37.6%), and seventh in first downs per route run (0.135, per Fantasy Points Data).”
FantasyPros Staff· Jul 10“If London had a legitimate quarterback, we could draft him higher, but instead, he'll once again have to deal with mediocrity in the form of Tua Tagovailoa or Penix. London is a fine selection in round two, but look elsewhere here.”
Tom Strachan· Jun 29“Over the first 10 weeks of 2025, London was the fantasy WR6, but with the Falcons stuttering and Michael Penix Jr. injured, he dropped to WR25 for the rest of the season. London has topped a 28% target share in three of his four NFL seasons. We know he'll draw targets, but it's their value that matters here.”
Tom Strachan· Jun 29“London will now be under contract through the 2030 season. He's topped 100 catches and 1000 yards once (2024) in his four-year career. He finished as the WR7 and WR14 the last two seasons in fantasy points per game (half-ppr).”
FFToday· Jun 2“Branch's ability with the ball in his hands should guarantee him at least some role right away in an Atlanta offense without much talent at wideout outside of Drake London.”
Ted Chmyz· May 5“Top cap hit: Drake London, $7,996,200 (2.65 percent)”
Logan Ulrich· Jul 5“Atlanta now employs the NFL's third-highest-paid players at tight end and wide receiver, with London scoring a four-year, $141.1MM extension earlier this month.”
Sam Robinson· Jun 24“Drake London is set to anchor the Falcons' receiver room once again in 2026 and well into the future.”
Adam La Rose· Jun 23“The Falcons signed WR Drake London to a long-term extension with a new-money average of $35.26 million per year and a total five-year base value of $157.88 million, including a $33.656 million signing bonus and fully guaranteed compensation through the first two years of the deal.”
Wyatt Grindley· Jun 16
“Lamar Jackson – 0.58 Most rushing TDs on fewer than 200 carries in 2025: 1”
The FF Newsletter· Aug 6“Lamar Jackson , Jayden Daniels , Joe Burrow , Baker Mayfield , and Kyler Murray all were selected as top-12 players at the position and finished double-digit slots behind expectations in terms of points per game.”
Rich Hribar· Aug 5“If Lamar Jackson can bounce back, Henry could inch back closer to his 2024 production (RB4 in fantasy points per game).”
FantasyPros Staff· Aug 5
See 12 more
“Injuries and a steep decline in rushing production cratered Lamar Jackson ‘s fantasy value in 2025. After finishing QB1 in fantasy scoring in 2024, Jackson plummeted to a QB20 fantasy finish last season and was QB16 in fantasy points per game at the position. Jackson lost three games to an early-season hamstring injury and one game to a late-season back injury.”
FantasyPros Staff· Aug 4“Lamar Jackson cratered many fantasy rosters in 2025. Before an early October hamstring injury, he was on pace for 3,700 passing yards, 437 rushing yards, and 47 total TDs.”
Vernon Meighan· Jul 27“The most obvious thing to consider is your positional strengths and weaknesses — trading for Lamar Jackson when you already have Josh Allen probably isn’t a good idea.”
Ted Chmyz· Jul 26“If you want an elite QB, pocket your picks for a round and a half and take Lamar Jackson, instead.”
Jeff Krisko· Jul 23“There isn’t a single drafted player on the Ravens that goes higher than I would take them, with Lamar Jackson standing out as the single best 1QB value I have ever seen if you want to get a top-two quarterback, going at pick 46, 19 picks past QB1, Josh Allen.”
Jeff Krisko· Jul 23“With plenty of time to recover from last season, Jackson is a ticking time bomb for fantasy production.”
Ellis Johnson· Jul 23“Things did not go well for Lamar Jackson in 2025, but he still displayed his ceiling early on before injuries started to stack up.”
Tom Strachan· Jul 21“For what it’s worth, Lamar did speak highly of Doyle’s offense this spring, saying: “ It’s a different system than what I’m accustomed to being in, and I feel like there’s going to be a lot of explosiveness this year.”
Matthew Betz· Jul 19“The case for Lamar staying near the top of the market: he’s not even 30 years old, he was still playing at an elite level in weeks one and two last season before his injury in week three derailed the rest of his year, and he has never failed to have an MVP-caliber first season under a new play caller, which is exactly the situation he’s in again this year.”
FantasyPros Staff· Jul 17“Jackson's 2025 performance was marred by injury and a subpar level of play (by his standards). Therefore, while he has tremendous leverage by virtue of the restructure and the $84.34MM cap number it created for 2027, he may want to come to the negotiating table on the heels of a better season.”
Rory Parks· Jul 12“Todd Monken, reflecting on where things went wrong in Baltimore last season, feels that he didn't get the most out of Lamar Jackson. "I didn't coach well enough," Monken said. "I didn't get Lamar to play at his best when the best was needed."”
Wyatt Grindley· Jul 11“Jackson mentioned that Doyle is running a completely different system from what Todd Monken deployed last season, while there are some concepts from what Greg Roman ran in 2022. Jackson expects more "explosiveness" this season, and Doyle is proving to be a very creative playcaller. "I feel like there's going to be a lot of explosiveness this year," Jackson said. "The way Declan calls plays and his creativity with his mind — how detailed he is — it's mind-blowing. I'm excited."”
Tony Camino· Jul 10