Drake London
vs Josh Jacobs
2026 · Week 5 · Half-PPR
The crowd’s lean
Week 5No weekly comparisons recorded for this pair.
This week
WEEK 5London
vs BAL
Oct 11 · 8:20 PM ET
Jacobs
vs CHI
Oct 11 · 1:00 PM ET
NA
13.8
Projected
—
Projected
Half-PPR
projection
2026 season, per game
2025 season, per game
Full game log & past seasons +
| WK | OPP | FPTS | RANK | TGT | REC | YD | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | — | 4.5 | WR65 | 5 | 2 | 29 | — |
2 | — | 6.9 | WR43 | 5 | 4 | 51 | — |
3 | — | 23.9 | WR2 | 10 | 9 | 194 | — |
4 | — | 12.1 | WR24 | 6 | 5 | 96 | — |
Earlier seasons (2025, 2024)
| WK | OPP | FPTS | RANK | TGT | REC | YD | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | TB | 9.5 | WR29 | 15 | 8 | 55 | — |
2 | MIN | 4.4 | WR76 | 4 | 3 | 49 | — |
3 | CAR | 8.0 | WR38 | 8 | 5 | 55 | — |
4 | WAS | 21.0 | WR6 | 10 | 8 | 110 | 1 |
5 | BYE | — | — | — | — | — | — |
6 | BUF | 26.8 | WR2 | 16 | 10 | 158 | 1 |
7 | SF | 6.2 | WR46 | 10 | 4 | 42 | — |
8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
9 | NE | 34.3 | WR1 | 14 | 9 | 118 | 3 |
10 | IND | 21.4 | WR1 | 8 | 6 | 104 | 1 |
11 | CAR | 15.4 | WR12 | 9 | 7 | 119 | — |
12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
16 | ARI | 4.2 | WR70 | 8 | 3 | 27 | — |
17 | LAR | 0.9 | WR115 | 2 | 1 | 4 | — |
18 | NO | 15.8 | WR8 | 8 | 4 | 78 | 1 |
| WK | OPP | FPTS | RANK | TGT | REC | YD | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | PIT | 2.5 | WR81 | 3 | 2 | 15 | — |
2 | PHI | 14.4 | WR18 | 7 | 6 | 54 | 1 |
3 | KC | 15.7 | WR18 | 9 | 6 | 67 | 1 |
4 | NO | 9.4 | WR38 | 12 | 6 | 64 | — |
5 | TB | 27.4 | WR2 | 13 | 12 | 154 | 1 |
6 | CAR | 16.4 | WR14 | 10 | 6 | 74 | 1 |
7 | SEA | 15.3 | WR9 | 8 | 6 | 63 | 1 |
8 | TB | 5.4 | WR64 | 6 | 4 | 34 | — |
9 | DAL | 9.7 | WR32 | 2 | 2 | 27 | 1 |
10 | NO | 13.7 | WR15 | 13 | 8 | 97 | — |
11 | DEN | 7.6 | WR45 | 7 | 3 | 61 | — |
12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
13 | LAC | 12.8 | WR25 | 16 | 9 | 86 | — |
14 | MIN | 9.5 | WR33 | 10 | 5 | 70 | — |
15 | LV | 12.8 | WR27 | 3 | 3 | 53 | 1 |
16 | NYG | 8.4 | WR45 | 8 | 5 | 59 | — |
17 | WAS | 14.1 | WR25 | 13 | 7 | 106 | — |
18 | CAR | 35.7 | WR1 | 18 | 10 | 187 | 2 |
| WK | OPP | FPTS | RANK | ATT | YD | TD | TGT | REC | RYD | RTD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | — | 0.0 | RB143 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
2 | — | 0.0 | RB116 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
3 | — | 0.0 | RB80 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
4 | — | 0.0 | RB90 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earlier seasons (2025, 2024)
| WK | OPP | FPTS | RANK | ATT | YD | TD | TGT | REC | RYD | RTD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | DET | 13.5 | RB14 | 19 | 66 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | — |
2 | WAS | 14.4 | RB17 | 23 | 84 | 1 | — | — | — | — |
3 | CLE | 9.9 | RB23 | 16 | 30 | — | 9 | 5 | 44 | — |
4 | DAL | 29.7 | RB2 | 22 | 86 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 71 | — |
5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
6 | CIN | 29.5 | RB4 | 18 | 93 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 57 | — |
7 | ARI | 18.3 | RB7 | 13 | 55 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | — |
8 | PIT | 12.0 | RB19 | 13 | 33 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 12 | — |
9 | CAR | 18.0 | RB4 | 17 | 87 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 13 | — |
10 | PHI | 17.2 | RB9 | 21 | 74 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 33 | — |
11 | NYG | 4.0 | RB45 | 7 | 40 | — | 1 | — | — | — |
12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
13 | DET | 9.6 | RB31 | 17 | 83 | — | 1 | 1 | 8 | — |
14 | CHI | 16.2 | RB11 | 20 | 86 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 | — |
15 | DEN | 22.2 | RB6 | 12 | 73 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 19 | 1 |
16 | CHI | 3.8 | RB54 | 12 | 36 | — | 2 | 2 | 12 | — |
17 | BAL | 0.8 | RB67 | 4 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| WK | OPP | FPTS | RANK | ATT | YD | TD | TGT | REC | RYD | RTD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | PHI | 11.4 | RB26 | 16 | 84 | — | 3 | 2 | 20 | — |
2 | IND | 13.1 | RB22 | 32 | 151 | — | — | — | — | — |
3 | TEN | 5.3 | RB44 | 14 | 43 | — | 1 | 1 | 5 | — |
4 | MIN | 9.8 | RB25 | 9 | 51 | — | 6 | 4 | 27 | — |
5 | LAR | 15.9 | RB8 | 19 | 73 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 21 | — |
6 | ARI | 10.5 | RB23 | 18 | 62 | — | 3 | 3 | 28 | — |
7 | HOU | 17.7 | RB14 | 12 | 76 | — | 5 | 5 | 16 | 1 |
8 | JAX | 25.0 | RB2 | 25 | 127 | 2 | 2 | 1 | -2 | — |
9 | DET | 11.8 | RB21 | 13 | 95 | — | 3 | 2 | 13 | — |
10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
11 | CHI | 21.4 | RB5 | 18 | 76 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 58 | — |
12 | SF | 28.6 | RB2 | 26 | 106 | 3 | 1 | — | — | — |
13 | MIA | 19.7 | RB6 | 19 | 43 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 74 | — |
14 | DET | 24.6 | RB3 | 18 | 66 | 3 | — | — | — | — |
15 | SEA | 19.6 | RB6 | 26 | 94 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 42 | — |
16 | NO | 18.7 | RB14 | 13 | 69 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 38 | — |
17 | MIN | 10.9 | RB15 | 17 | 69 | 1 | — | — | — | — |
18 | CHI | 11.1 | RB19 | 6 | 44 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | — |
Expert takes
“He leads all receivers in YAC per reception (10.55), per FantasyPtsData, and ranks: • 4.25 YPRR (WR3) • 48.2% team yardage market share (WR2) • 0.172 first downs per route run (WR5) London has yet to score a TD or be targeted in the red zone - positive regression is imminent.”
The FF Newsletter· Oct 8, 2026“Drake London has now overtaken JSN for highest % of team’s receiving yards.”
Kyle Borgognoni· Sep 28, 2026“With Penix at the helm, London is back to being a locked-in top-12 wide receiver.”
Wyatt Bertolone· Sep 28, 2026
See 6 more
“We needed the Falcons to stop making an offense built around Bijan Robinson and Drake London look like such a difficult assignment. Bijan piling up 213 scrimmage yards with two TDs, and London catching nine passes for 194 yards is a pretty convincing argument for getting your best players the friggin’ ball. That is why you should be encouraged by Penix.”
Chris Cash· Sep 28, 2026“Drake London gets a boost now that Penix Jr. is Atlanta’s starting QB, with 16.4 fantasy PPG with Penix Jr.”
Jordan Pullett· Sep 25, 2026“Atlanta has not reached the red zone through two games, and London has yet to see a red-zone or deep target. Michael Penix Jr. returning should help, but Green Bay has been tough on perimeter receivers, so I am not expecting the quarterback change to fix everything right away. I would still start London in most leagues, but I think he is more likely to give you a low-end WR2 week than play up to that top-30 flex ranking.” – Justin Fuhr ( Pro Football Mania )”
FantasyPros Staff· Sep 24, 2026“London has an 18.5% target share, 1.78 YPRR, zero red zone targets, zero deep targets, and a team-leading 20% first-read share. London hasn’t been bad, as he ranks 25th in separation score among 101 qualifying receivers after two weeks, but he can’t throw accurate passes to himself. We’ll see if he can get on track this week against a secondary that has held perimeter wide receivers to the sixth-fewest yards per target, but has allowed the 13th-most fantasy points per opportunity to the position.”
FantasyPros Staff· Sep 23, 2026“London can still rebound, but if he’s going to reach his WR1 ceiling, he needs Michael Penix or Tua Tagovailoa to return. Until then, he’s more of a boom-or-bust WR2/3. For a guy with a second-round price tag, panic is definitely valid.”
Tim Brosnan· Sep 21, 2026“Falcons WR Drake London had just two catches for 29 yards on four targets and TE Kyle Pitts failed to catch his lone target. “Bijan is a great player. We are going to continue leaning on him, but we have to find ways to get all of our guys touches,” Falcons HC Kevin Stefanski said via the Athletic’s Josh Kendall .”
Logan Ulrich· Sep 14, 2026
“Josh Jacobs, Green Bay (78% rostered) The video tape evidence against Josh Jacobs is set to be released to the NFL at some point. He won’t play again this season. MarShawn Lloyd, Green Bay (72% rostered) The Packers gambled that the above would not be true, and lost.”
Jeff Krisko· Sep 29, 2026“The Packers’ pass rate in the absence of Josh Jacobs is also a big reason for their success. The Packers ranked 28th in pass rate last season at 52%, and have jumped to second in pass rate this season at 66.7%, behind the Houston Texans . Golden’s stock dropped over the course of the 2025 season as he was never a focal point of Green Bay’s offense.”
Jordan Pullett· Sep 23, 2026“Insiders believe that Jacobs could be back as early as Week 5 once the NFL clears his suspension review, with time on the NFI list counting as time toward any suspension. With a murky committee in place for the next couple of weeks, there is absolutely no reason to chase anyone in this backfield on the waiver wire. Conclusion: Avoid the Green Bay committee; Chris Brooks is a snap-share mirage, and Josh Jacobs will reclaim his kingdom soon.”
Nate Henry· Sep 22, 2026
See 12 more
“Jacobs was originally booked on five charges, including strangulation, but instead faced reduced charges of misdemeanor battery and criminal damage to property. Generally speaking, the NFL has a six-game minimum suspension length for incidents of domestic violence. Jacobs, 28, was selected with the No. 24 overall pick by the Raiders out of Alabama in 2019.”
Logan Ulrich· Sep 13, 2026“5% Josh Jacobs is on the commissioner’s exempt list, which suddenly puts Lloyd in position to lead GB’s backfield with limited NFL experience.”
Chris Cash· Sep 11, 2026“Based on the NFL’s statement, though, there is still no timeline for clarity to emerge regarding how much time Jacobs will miss during the regular season. As noted by Mark Maske of Front Office Sports , any games Jacobs spends on the commissioner’s exempt list before a ban were to be handed down would count toward his suspension. Players typically lose their game checks for each contest missed through suspension, but Maske adds Jacobs would have his pay returned for any games sidelined on the exempt list prior to a suspension being handed down.”
Adam La Rose· Sep 11, 2026“The legal situation swirling around Josh Jacobs will definitely put a crimp into the plans of how the Packers operate, forcing oft-injured MarShawn Lloyd to become the de facto top running back instead.”
Evan Tarracciano· Sep 4, 2026“Josh Jacobs was placed on the Commissioner's Exempt List, and his availability is unknown.”
Curtis Hirsch· Aug 31, 2026“Josh Jacobs is one of the easiest running backs to target on Fantrax if he slips to his ADP of 40. At a 32 ADP on FantasyPros, that is eight picks later than other sites. Jacobs has already demonstrated a high-end fantasy ceiling and a true workhorse role in Green Bay.”
Ryan Kirksey· Aug 24, 2026“Round 13: MarShawn Lloyd (RB – GB) Josh Jacobs could still be suspended by the NFL, allowing MarShawn Lloyd a chance to get on the field.”
Richard Janvrin· Aug 22, 2026“If healthy, Jacobs has a top-5 fantasy ceiling. But as the 28-year-old continues to pile up volume and small injuries, fantasy managers should be wary of the production tapering off.”
FantasyPros Staff· Aug 11, 2026“Josh Jacobs (RB – GB) Going as the RB14, 21st overall, Jacobs is projected for 289 carries, 1,161 rushing yards, and 12 rushing touchdowns, plus another 36 catches and roughly one receiving touchdown. Health was the story that took some shine off last season, as a knee bruise and thigh injury limited him over the second half.”
FantasyPros Staff· Aug 8, 2026“Josh Jacobs was involved in an offseason domestic incident that is reportedly still under investigation, though no charges have been filed.”
Curtis Hirsch· Aug 5, 2026“1 | Diff: +5 Josh Jacobs has been the RB8 and RB9 in fantasy points per game during his two seasons in Green Bay.”
FantasyPros Staff· Aug 5, 2026“Josh Jacobs might be the biggest value in early fantasy football drafts. Despite finishing as a productive fantasy back last season, Jacobs is currently being drafted outside the top 12 running backs in many formats. The case is simple: Green Bay trusts Jacobs near the goal line, he remains heavily involved as an early-down runner, and his receiving floor is underrated.”
FantasyPros Staff· May 10, 2026
Who scores most this week?
Choose your top 3 from upcoming games.
Tap players in order to build your rankings.