Fantasy JoesBuild your rankings

Colston Loveland
vs Malik Nabers

2026 · Week 5 · Half-PPR

Colston Loveland
TE · CHI
Malik Nabers
WR · NYG

The crowd’s lean

Week 5

No weekly comparisons recorded for this pair.

This week

WEEK 5

Loveland

at GB

Oct 11 · 1:00 PM ET

Nabers

at WAS

Oct 11 · 1:00 PM ET

8.5

Projected

11.7

Projected

Half-PPR
projection

2026 season, per game

LovelandNabers
3.6Fantasy pts9.0
4Games4
4.5Targets6.5
—Receptions4.5
—Receiving yds52
—Touchdowns—
LovelandNabers
8.5Fantasy pts12.0
16Games4
5.1Targets8.8
3.6Receptions4.5
45Receiving yds68
0.4Touchdowns0.5
Full game log & past seasons +
Colston Loveland
2026 game log
WKOPPFPTSRANKTGTRECYDTD
1
—
0.0
TE77
2
—
—
—
2
—
0.8
TE56
3
1
3
—
3
—
5.1
TE29
4
4
31
—
4
—
8.7
TE18
9
6
57
—
Earlier seasons (2025)
2025 game log
WKOPPFPTSRANKTGTRECYDTD
1
MIN
2.2
TE40
2
2
12
—
2
DET
0.0
TE64
1
—
—
—
3
DAL
3.6
TE32
3
1
31
—
4
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
5
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
6
WAS
2.1
TE42
3
2
11
—
7
NO
3.9
TE28
4
3
24
—
8
BAL
5.3
TE20
5
3
38
—
9
CIN
26.8
TE2
7
6
118
2
10
NYG
7.5
TE15
4
4
55
—
11
MIN
5.5
TE17
4
3
40
—
12
PIT
12.9
TE2
5
4
49
1
13
PHI
4.3
TE28
6
3
28
—
14
GB
10.9
TE9
5
4
29
1
15
CLE
8.1
TE16
5
4
63
—
16
GB
4.5
TE23
5
3
30
—
17
SF
18.4
TE2
10
6
94
1
18
DET
20.1
TE1
13
10
91
1
Malik Nabers
2026 game log
WKOPPFPTSRANKTGTRECYDTD
1
—
9.9
WR28
9
6
69
—
2
—
0.6
WR116
4
1
1
—
3
—
5.1
WR66
6
5
26
—
4
—
20.2
WR10
7
6
112
1
Earlier seasons (2025, 2024)
2025 game log
WKOPPFPTSRANKTGTRECYDTD
1
WAS
9.6
WR28
12
5
71
—
2
DAL
33.2
WR2
13
9
167
2
3
KC
2.3
WR88
7
2
13
—
4
LAC
3.0
WR77
3
2
20
—
2024 game log
WKOPPFPTSRANKTGTRECYDTD
1
MIN
9.1
WR32
7
5
66
—
2
WAS
23.7
WR3
18
10
127
1
3
CLE
24.2
WR3
12
8
78
2
4
DAL
17.1
WR12
15
12
115
—
5
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
6
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
7
PHI
6.1
WR43
8
4
41
—
8
PIT
10.6
WR38
13
7
71
—
9
WAS
10.4
WR29
11
9
59
—
10
CAR
7.8
WR30
10
6
50
—
11
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
12
TB
9.4
WR26
9
6
64
—
13
DAL
11.3
WR28
13
8
69
—
14
NO
12.4
WR25
10
5
79
—
15
BAL
19.2
WR10
14
10
82
1
16
ATL
10.3
WR32
14
7
68
—
17
IND
32.6
WR2
8
7
171
2
18
PHI
14.9
WR15
8
5
64
1

Expert takes

Colston Loveland
  • “While he didn’t post a massive stat line, Loveland had a 66.7% route share and 91% snap share as he led the team with a 26.5% target share and 34.8% first-read share. Loveland had three red zone targets, 57 receiving yards, and 2.38 YPRR. This week, Loveland faces a Green Bay secondary that has the sixth-highest two-high rate in the NFL (62.1%).”

    FantasyPros Staff· Oct 8, 2026
  • “The arrow is clearly pointing up for Loveland, who has a chance to become a bigger part of this offense as the season progresses. With the Bears potentially leaning on their passing game to keep pace with the Packers, Loveland could see another healthy dose of targets. I like the idea of using Loveland to save money as an alternative if you don’t want to pay full price for Trey McBride.”

    Frank Ammirante· Oct 10, 2026
  • “Last week, Loveland had an 11.8% target share, 31 receiving yards (1.35 YPRR), and a 10.3% first-read share. This is woeful usage for a player with his talent level. The Jets have held tight ends to the 13th-fewest yards per target and the eighth-fewest fantasy points per opportunity.”

    Derek Brown· Oct 1, 2026
See 7 more
  • “TEs Colston Loveland has one catch for three yards through the first two weeks of the season. Caleb Williams ’ hamstring injury hurts all Bears pass-catchers, but Loveland turns into a player that I would advise starting with either Tyson Bagent or Case Keenum at QB. Tucker Kraft ’s return from a torn ACL has been slower than fantasy managers would have hoped for when drafting him, but the increase to 98% of snaps is a sign of encouragement.”

    Jordan Pullett· Sep 25, 2026
  • “Loveland may not mean as much to Ben Johnson ’s offense as Trey McBride or Brock Bowers mean to their offenses, limiting his ceiling when comparing him to the other elite TEs.”

    Jordan Pullett· Sep 23, 2026
  • “How crazy is it that Colston Loveland has combined for only one catch for three yards in two games? An absolutely insane outcome compared to the hype he was getting coming into the season. We have no choice but to downgrade Loveland moving forward, especially with Caleb Williams out for the foreseeable future.”

    Frank Ammirante· Sep 23, 2026
  • “I was always skeptical that Loveland would reach his elite ceiling, and he certainly hasn’t done anything to change that impression. If you can move him for a top-half TE1 price tag, do it.”

    Ted Chmyz· Sep 23, 2026
  • “Colston Loveland ‘s 0.05 YPRR is utterly painful considering he’s run the 6th most routes of any TE.”

    Kyle Borgognoni· Sep 21, 2026
  • “Chicago will be without quarterback Caleb Williams for the near future due to his hamstring injury, so the time to “buy low” on a potential bounce-back for Loveland is now.”

    Evan Tarracciano· Sep 21, 2026
  • “Loveland was always going to need consistent involvement AND reliable quarterback play to become the weekly TE1 fantasy managers drafted him to be. Unfortunately, the next man up for the Bears at QB is Tyson Bagent who hasn’t thrown a TD since 2023. As it stands, the panic alarm is screaming for Loveland.”

    Tim Brosnan· Sep 21, 2026
Malik Nabers
  • “So far this season, according to the Fantasy Points Data Suite, Nabers has a 25.6% target share on all routes run and averages 0.45 fantasy points per route. This week he is up against Amik Robertson . I do feel bad for name-checking Robertson every week in this column .”

    Adam Murfet· Oct 8, 2026
  • “Nabers is coming off a good game, opening the door to selling him high. Daniel Jones has played poorly this year, and Alec Pierce ‘s absence is concerning for Jonathan Taylor ‘s outlook. In 17 games with Pierce since 2025, Taylor has recorded 96.1 rushing yards per game, 4.9 yards per carry and 20.58 half-PPR points per game.”

    Josh Shepardson· Oct 10, 2026
  • “He is coming off his best game of the season, but let’s be honest with ourselves here: going into the week, you would have loved to be fielding offers for Nabers with the situation the Giants’ offense was facing and the different injuries Nabers was dealing with as well. Now he has his big game, and lets not revert back to holding again, lets take our blessing and sell, sell, sell. I would look to grab someone like a Tetairoa McMillan who just had a monster game, but could easily fool owners into a sell-high situation himself.”

    FantasyPros Staff· Oct 8, 2026
See 10 more
  • “Here’s the thing: Malik Nabers is not back to full health yet. He’s near the bottom of the league in separation score this season and is sitting behind Isaiah Likely in target share. With every passing week, Nabers should be inching closer to his old self.”

    Jim Moorman· Oct 6, 2026
  • “As a result of Winston getting back to slinging it, Malik Nabers had six receptions for 112 yards and a touchdown on seven targets, and Isaiah Likely had seven receptions for 66 scoreless yards on 12 targets. Winston’s showing provides gamers with hope for Nabers and Likely. That said, it may be best to use this as a selling window for Nabers.”

    Josh Shepardson· Oct 5, 2026
  • “Winston was trying to keep it simple by going to his first read at the seventh-highest rate, and even though Malik Nabers was the first read on 37% of plays, it counted for nothing because of the poor weather and the crowded area the ball was thrown into. We have to face the fact that this could be another lost season for Nabers, who hasn’t yet reached 10 half-PPR points in any game. The Cardinals’ pass defense ranks 30th in EPA allowed and has given up the 12th-most schedule-adjusted fantasy points to wide receivers.”

    Tom Strachan· Sep 30, 2026
  • “If you drafted Nabers expecting a weekly WR1, there is plenty of reason to panic. I’m not selling him for scraps, and I’m not outright dropping him, but he’s fallen into risky FLEX territory. On the plus side, the Giants have three favorable matchups coming up.”

    FantasyPros Staff· Sep 29, 2026
  • “Nabers was targeted on four occasions in the loss , missing a handful of snaps due to – what later turned out to be – a dislocated shoulder…and this is what concerns me way more than who happens to be throwing the former first-round pick the ball for the rest of the year. With Dart out, you could be forgiven for proclaiming this an already lost season for John Harbaugh’s men – so would it be crazy to suggest they may just shut down their star WR to save any more damage being done for little to no gain?”

    PaulMarnie· Sep 26, 2026
  • “Stack Idea: Dart + Nabers + Kyren + Mevis Malik Nabers $13,500 Nabers is my lower-owned CPT alternative, as I currently have him at just under 10%. He caught six passes for 69 yards in his return last week, and his projected CPT ownership is less than half Dart’s. I want some lineups where the Giants’ biggest receiving performance belongs to Nabers, with Dart collecting the passing points in FLEX.”

    Chris Cash· Sep 21, 2026
  • “Nabers ran a route on 24 of those 36 snaps and quickly commanded nine targets.”

    Nate Henry· Sep 15, 2026
  • “Malik Nabers (WR – NYG) Going as the WR11, around the 27th overall pick, Nabers has shown real positive injury progression, moving out of the no-contact jersey and into full team drills.”

    FantasyPros Staff· Aug 28, 2026
  • “Malik Nabers completely avoided the PUP list this offseason and has been trending towards starting the season as close to completely healthy as anyone could have hoped for. Nabers is still a potential value at his current ECR and ADP, as it was at this time just a year ago, when he was a popular first round draft target.”

    Raju Byfield· Aug 23, 2026
  • “At the start of the offseason, this was a no-brainer selection for “riskiest player to draft.” After all, Malik Nabers could barely hobble to first base in a friendly kickball game.”

    Ellis Johnson· Aug 21, 2026

Who scores most this week?

Choose your top 3 from upcoming games.

Tap players in order to build your rankings.

Open full game ↗
Past weeks
Draft history and ADP
ADP 43.2
Colston Loveland
TE · CHI · TE3
ADP 27.3
Malik Nabers
WR · NYG · WR11
VS
The crowd's leanAll time
84% would rather draft Nabers over Loveland
16%Loveland
84%Nabers
Based on 81 comparison results