CeeDee Lamb
vs Josh Jacobs
2026 · Week 5 · Half-PPR
The crowd’s lean
Week 5No weekly comparisons recorded for this pair.
This week
WEEK 5Lamb
vs TB
Oct 8 · 8:15 PM ET
Questionable
Jacobs
vs CHI
Oct 11 · 1:00 PM ET
NA
1.9
Game ended
—
Projected
Half-PPR
points
2026 season, per game
2025 season, per game
Full game log & past seasons +
| WK | OPP | FPTS | RANK | TGT | REC | YD | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | — | 12.9 | WR18 | 8 | 5 | 44 | 1 |
2 | — | 31.3 | WR3 | 9 | 8 | 153 | 2 |
3 | — | 16.7 | WR14 | 8 | 7 | 112 | — |
4 | — | 32.8 | WR2 | 21 | 17 | 189 | 1 |
5 | — | 1.9 | — | — | — | — | — |
Earlier seasons (2025, 2024)
| WK | OPP | FPTS | RANK | TGT | REC | YD | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | PHI | 14.5 | WR15 | 13 | 7 | 110 | — |
2 | NYG | 15.7 | WR12 | 11 | 9 | 112 | — |
3 | CHI | 0.0 | WR137 | — | — | — | — |
4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
7 | WAS | 19.5 | WR11 | 8 | 5 | 110 | 1 |
8 | DEN | 11.1 | WR24 | 10 | 7 | 74 | — |
9 | ARI | 12.0 | WR25 | 12 | 7 | 85 | — |
10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
11 | LV | 15.1 | WR13 | 7 | 5 | 66 | 1 |
12 | PHI | 9.5 | WR29 | 11 | 4 | 75 | — |
13 | KC | 20.7 | WR5 | 9 | 7 | 112 | 1 |
14 | DET | 15.1 | WR11 | 8 | 6 | 121 | — |
15 | MIN | 14.1 | WR18 | 10 | 6 | 111 | — |
16 | LAC | 8.1 | WR37 | 7 | 6 | 51 | — |
17 | WAS | 7.1 | WR41 | 10 | 5 | 46 | — |
18 | NYG | 0.9 | WR99 | 1 | 1 | 4 | — |
| WK | OPP | FPTS | RANK | TGT | REC | YD | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | CLE | 11.1 | WR24 | 10 | 5 | 61 | — |
2 | NO | 17.0 | WR15 | 7 | 4 | 90 | 1 |
3 | BAL | 6.7 | WR52 | 7 | 4 | 67 | — |
4 | NYG | 20.1 | WR5 | 8 | 7 | 98 | 1 |
5 | PIT | 8.9 | WR42 | 9 | 5 | 62 | — |
6 | DET | 12.6 | WR24 | 14 | 7 | 89 | — |
7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
8 | SF | 33.1 | WR1 | 17 | 13 | 146 | 2 |
9 | ATL | 12.2 | WR24 | 12 | 8 | 47 | — |
10 | PHI | 5.4 | WR51 | 10 | 6 | 21 | — |
11 | HOU | 14.6 | WR20 | 12 | 8 | 93 | — |
12 | WAS | 11.8 | WR18 | 12 | 10 | 67 | — |
13 | NYG | 4.9 | WR67 | 6 | 2 | 39 | — |
14 | CIN | 18.4 | WR11 | 7 | 6 | 93 | 1 |
15 | CAR | 22.1 | WR7 | 13 | 9 | 116 | 1 |
16 | TB | 14.0 | WR20 | 8 | 7 | 105 | — |
| WK | OPP | FPTS | RANK | ATT | YD | TD | TGT | REC | RYD | RTD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | — | 0.0 | RB143 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
2 | — | 0.0 | RB116 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
3 | — | 0.0 | RB80 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
4 | — | 0.0 | RB90 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earlier seasons (2025, 2024)
| WK | OPP | FPTS | RANK | ATT | YD | TD | TGT | REC | RYD | RTD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | DET | 13.5 | RB14 | 19 | 66 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | — |
2 | WAS | 14.4 | RB17 | 23 | 84 | 1 | — | — | — | — |
3 | CLE | 9.9 | RB23 | 16 | 30 | — | 9 | 5 | 44 | — |
4 | DAL | 29.7 | RB2 | 22 | 86 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 71 | — |
5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
6 | CIN | 29.5 | RB4 | 18 | 93 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 57 | — |
7 | ARI | 18.3 | RB7 | 13 | 55 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | — |
8 | PIT | 12.0 | RB19 | 13 | 33 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 12 | — |
9 | CAR | 18.0 | RB4 | 17 | 87 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 13 | — |
10 | PHI | 17.2 | RB9 | 21 | 74 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 33 | — |
11 | NYG | 4.0 | RB45 | 7 | 40 | — | 1 | — | — | — |
12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
13 | DET | 9.6 | RB31 | 17 | 83 | — | 1 | 1 | 8 | — |
14 | CHI | 16.2 | RB11 | 20 | 86 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 | — |
15 | DEN | 22.2 | RB6 | 12 | 73 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 19 | 1 |
16 | CHI | 3.8 | RB54 | 12 | 36 | — | 2 | 2 | 12 | — |
17 | BAL | 0.8 | RB67 | 4 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| WK | OPP | FPTS | RANK | ATT | YD | TD | TGT | REC | RYD | RTD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | PHI | 11.4 | RB26 | 16 | 84 | — | 3 | 2 | 20 | — |
2 | IND | 13.1 | RB22 | 32 | 151 | — | — | — | — | — |
3 | TEN | 5.3 | RB44 | 14 | 43 | — | 1 | 1 | 5 | — |
4 | MIN | 9.8 | RB25 | 9 | 51 | — | 6 | 4 | 27 | — |
5 | LAR | 15.9 | RB8 | 19 | 73 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 21 | — |
6 | ARI | 10.5 | RB23 | 18 | 62 | — | 3 | 3 | 28 | — |
7 | HOU | 17.7 | RB14 | 12 | 76 | — | 5 | 5 | 16 | 1 |
8 | JAX | 25.0 | RB2 | 25 | 127 | 2 | 2 | 1 | -2 | — |
9 | DET | 11.8 | RB21 | 13 | 95 | — | 3 | 2 | 13 | — |
10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
11 | CHI | 21.4 | RB5 | 18 | 76 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 58 | — |
12 | SF | 28.6 | RB2 | 26 | 106 | 3 | 1 | — | — | — |
13 | MIA | 19.7 | RB6 | 19 | 43 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 74 | — |
14 | DET | 24.6 | RB3 | 18 | 66 | 3 | — | — | — | — |
15 | SEA | 19.6 | RB6 | 26 | 94 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 42 | — |
16 | NO | 18.7 | RB14 | 13 | 69 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 38 | — |
17 | MIN | 10.9 | RB15 | 17 | 69 | 1 | — | — | — | — |
18 | CHI | 11.1 | RB19 | 6 | 44 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | — |
Expert takes
“CeeDee Lamb dominated against the Houston Texans ’ defense, recording 17 receptions for 189 yards and a TD.”
Jordan Pullett· Oct 10, 2026“Lamb is in a spot to keep things going here as a front-end WR1 . He has both Prescott's passing touchdowns against the blitz this season, accounting for a team-high 54.1% of the air yards on blitzes. Tampa Bay is 23rd in yards allowed per target to WR1 receivers (10.6) with an 8.7% touchdown rate (27th) to those receivers.”
Rich Hribar· Oct 6, 2026“CeeDee Lamb has been the more productive of the two wide receivers, posting a 26.2% target share, 0.30 TPRR, 34.0% first-read share and 46.7% air yard share this season. He’s converted his tantalizing underlying data into 13 receptions (6.5 per game), 197 receiving yards (98.5 per game), three receiving touchdowns, 26.85 DraftKings points per game, 23.36 expected DraftKings points per game, 22.10 FanDuel points per game and 20.25 expected FanDuel points per game. Lamb could put up another big effort this week.”
Josh Shepardson· Sep 24, 2026
See 8 more
“CeeDee Lamb (WR – DAL) It was a really disappointing 2025 for CeeDee Lamb , posting the second-lowest numbers of his career in targets (117), receptions (75) and receiving yards (1,077), with only his rookie season in 2020 worse. He also had a career-low three touchdowns. The newly arrived George Pickens recorded a 22.1% target share in the red zone compared to Lamb’s 18.6%, which was also behind Jake Ferguson , who led the team with 23.1%.”
Tom Strachan· Aug 28, 2026“Lamb is a pick I don’t exactly love in a vacuum. I am lower on him than most this season and don’t believe he should be a first-round pick in fantasy.”
Samwise· Aug 16, 2026“Lamb remains a locked-in WR1 with a stellar quarterback in his prime and George Pickens alongside him to keep defenses honest.”
FantasyPros Staff· Aug 14, 2026“CeeDee Lamb (WR – DAL) In a world where George Pickens had hit the open market, or was traded by the Cowboys this offseason, instead of signing his franchise tag tender, CeeDee Lamb could have been back in the top two wide receiver conversation.”
Tom Strachan· Aug 11, 2026“CeeDee Lamb is eminently talented, do not get me wrong there, and this offense will promise to be extremely high-flying and productive. However, he has one season in his career wherein he finished higher than WR7 or with more than 17.7 PPR points per game. That season came in 2023 when he led the NFL in targets with 181 targets.”
Jeff Krisko· Jul 26, 2026“Lamb is coming off the least productive season of his career. There's no questioning his talent, but I'm still unsure how he'll fit into Dallas' new offensive scheme. That said, he'll still command an elite target share, and that's ultimately why we're drafting him. Lamb's combination of volume, explosiveness and big-play ability gives him overall WR1 upside if everything clicks.”
Kurt Blakeway· Jul 7, 2026“CeeDee Lamb posted his fifth straight 1,000-yard season.”
Sharp Football Staff· Jun 24, 2026“CeeDee Lamb was framed as one of the safest high-end fantasy receivers because of his ability to consistently function as the centerpiece of an offense. Even when offensive conditions fluctuate, receivers who dominate targets maintain elite fantasy floors. There was little concern expressed about talent or role, with the conversation focused on how dependable his fantasy profile remains compared to many receivers drafted around him.”
FantasyPros Staff· May 23, 2026
“Josh Jacobs, Green Bay (78% rostered) The video tape evidence against Josh Jacobs is set to be released to the NFL at some point. He won’t play again this season. MarShawn Lloyd, Green Bay (72% rostered) The Packers gambled that the above would not be true, and lost.”
Jeff Krisko· Sep 29, 2026“The Packers’ pass rate in the absence of Josh Jacobs is also a big reason for their success. The Packers ranked 28th in pass rate last season at 52%, and have jumped to second in pass rate this season at 66.7%, behind the Houston Texans . Golden’s stock dropped over the course of the 2025 season as he was never a focal point of Green Bay’s offense.”
Jordan Pullett· Sep 23, 2026“Insiders believe that Jacobs could be back as early as Week 5 once the NFL clears his suspension review, with time on the NFI list counting as time toward any suspension. With a murky committee in place for the next couple of weeks, there is absolutely no reason to chase anyone in this backfield on the waiver wire. Conclusion: Avoid the Green Bay committee; Chris Brooks is a snap-share mirage, and Josh Jacobs will reclaim his kingdom soon.”
Nate Henry· Sep 22, 2026
See 12 more
“Jacobs was originally booked on five charges, including strangulation, but instead faced reduced charges of misdemeanor battery and criminal damage to property. Generally speaking, the NFL has a six-game minimum suspension length for incidents of domestic violence. Jacobs, 28, was selected with the No. 24 overall pick by the Raiders out of Alabama in 2019.”
Logan Ulrich· Sep 13, 2026“5% Josh Jacobs is on the commissioner’s exempt list, which suddenly puts Lloyd in position to lead GB’s backfield with limited NFL experience.”
Chris Cash· Sep 11, 2026“Based on the NFL’s statement, though, there is still no timeline for clarity to emerge regarding how much time Jacobs will miss during the regular season. As noted by Mark Maske of Front Office Sports , any games Jacobs spends on the commissioner’s exempt list before a ban were to be handed down would count toward his suspension. Players typically lose their game checks for each contest missed through suspension, but Maske adds Jacobs would have his pay returned for any games sidelined on the exempt list prior to a suspension being handed down.”
Adam La Rose· Sep 11, 2026“The legal situation swirling around Josh Jacobs will definitely put a crimp into the plans of how the Packers operate, forcing oft-injured MarShawn Lloyd to become the de facto top running back instead.”
Evan Tarracciano· Sep 4, 2026“Josh Jacobs was placed on the Commissioner's Exempt List, and his availability is unknown.”
Curtis Hirsch· Aug 31, 2026“Josh Jacobs is one of the easiest running backs to target on Fantrax if he slips to his ADP of 40. At a 32 ADP on FantasyPros, that is eight picks later than other sites. Jacobs has already demonstrated a high-end fantasy ceiling and a true workhorse role in Green Bay.”
Ryan Kirksey· Aug 24, 2026“Round 13: MarShawn Lloyd (RB – GB) Josh Jacobs could still be suspended by the NFL, allowing MarShawn Lloyd a chance to get on the field.”
Richard Janvrin· Aug 22, 2026“If healthy, Jacobs has a top-5 fantasy ceiling. But as the 28-year-old continues to pile up volume and small injuries, fantasy managers should be wary of the production tapering off.”
FantasyPros Staff· Aug 11, 2026“Josh Jacobs (RB – GB) Going as the RB14, 21st overall, Jacobs is projected for 289 carries, 1,161 rushing yards, and 12 rushing touchdowns, plus another 36 catches and roughly one receiving touchdown. Health was the story that took some shine off last season, as a knee bruise and thigh injury limited him over the second half.”
FantasyPros Staff· Aug 8, 2026“Josh Jacobs was involved in an offseason domestic incident that is reportedly still under investigation, though no charges have been filed.”
Curtis Hirsch· Aug 5, 2026“1 | Diff: +5 Josh Jacobs has been the RB8 and RB9 in fantasy points per game during his two seasons in Green Bay.”
FantasyPros Staff· Aug 5, 2026“Josh Jacobs might be the biggest value in early fantasy football drafts. Despite finishing as a productive fantasy back last season, Jacobs is currently being drafted outside the top 12 running backs in many formats. The case is simple: Green Bay trusts Jacobs near the goal line, he remains heavily involved as an early-down runner, and his receiving floor is underrated.”
FantasyPros Staff· May 10, 2026
Who scores most this week?
Choose your top 3 from upcoming games.
Tap players in order to build your rankings.